• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    3 days ago

    Explanation: In Christian mythology, the ichthys symbol, depicted, was used as a secret sign of one’s faith. To outsiders, it would appear only as an innocent fish - to those in the know, it would be a sign of belonging to the DANGEROUS CULT OF CHRISTIANITY.

    It still sees use today, though not as a secret so much as virtue signaling.

    • Gandalf the Gorsed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The reason for them choosing the symbol was because ichthys was an anagram acronym:

      Ιησους - Jesus Χριστός - Christ Θεού - of God Υιός - son Σωτήρ - saviour
      I.e. Jesus Christ, son of God, (our) saviour
      Or maybe they just thought God was a fish ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It means they belong to a cult that practices ritual cannibalism.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      The fish came first, the crucifix is more aligned with Paul’s interpretation of Christianity, where doing what Jesus said to do is unimportant next to believing in his blood sacrifice. Christianity was pretty based actually up until Paul got his grubby little proto-mega-pastor fingers into it.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Christianity was pretty based actually up until…

        That’s true of a lot of things sadly. Religion just happens to be one of the oldest humanity still regularly engages in.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Both the crucifix and the ichtus appeared a long time after Paul. And he never says that following what Jesus said to do is unimportant; he just preached a liberation from the need to try to be perfect, to follow moral rules literally, exactly the contrary to what mega-pastors do today.

        Paul has a bad name because he was recuperated and deformed by evangelicalism.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          He overcorrected, and yeah we have evangelicalism now. But even in his day, he had the seed of it in him. Sure, this guy who was just persecuting Christians miraculously had a vision that just so happened to conflict with the actual disciples. Dude was always a mega-pastor at heart.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Let’s say that Paul’s letters contain the seeds of things that can lead to very problematic theologies. But Paul himself, with his emphasis on freedom and his rejection of moral sanctity and literalism, isn’t so bad. His main problem, in my opinion, is his almost pathological fear of scandal, which leads him to accept too many things from his society in order not to offend anyone.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Eh, the moral sanctity of faith > works? Paul was selling. He wanted to be the guy, so he massaged the message a bit to make it more marketable. You can make an argument for moving away from the stricter OT observances, but again the result was an overcorrection.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they walk the walk, then that’s cool… But 99% of them are bigots and hypocrites.

    The saying, which is regrettable, that is almost always true is that “there is no hate quite like Christian love.”

    I feel bad for the ones that really do follow their Bible’s in a heart-centered path. Those are typically great people. They’re just outnumbered by the many, many awful Christians that live amongst us all.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    that’s how they catch ya. by the time you’ve been initiated to the 333 sacred mysteries of the fishie you wake up and realize fuck, this is just christianity AGAIN