The art on the header seems AI? Will AI run the anrchoworld of the future?

  • AviAdi@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I guess anarchist don’t believe you can prevent someone from polluting an area since you can’t control what people do? I guess I don’t know how I feel living downstream from someone who is free to throw their sewage in the river…

    • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dramatic false equivalence?

      If you would keep to the topic on copyright or intellectual property that would be great. In a movement that believes private, intellectual, property is theft then the extension to using that for the benefit of others is not a problem.

      • AviAdi@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well then I’m ok with that, although I live in Hollywood and know artist that rely on making their living via copyright and IP so I need to see how they would feel about it.

        • alapakala@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Copyright doesn’t compensate artists, fans do.
          Copyright allows the state to enforce rents on whatever the state arbitrates rents need to be due upon.

          It’s precisely the fact AI corporations have lobbied themselves off copyright infringement, that you’re seeing the exact reason copyright was dictated since its origin.

          Anarchists are against monopolies, esp. in press; therefore copyrights and intellectual properties by extension. This doesn’t mean we approve of the monopolies in press, but that your state invented the hypocrisy to oppress.

          We are against both, anti press ways, and corporate power, which the state ordains.
          both is good