• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Neat. It’s going to be interesting how they will solve the issue of different quality settings - I don’t care about FPS at “ultra” settings, usually it’s more important how the FPS are at low settings before you have to take desperate measures like turning down the resolution, completely turning off antialiasing, using upscaling etc. that have an extremely negative effect on graphics fidelity.

    Also, two games running at an average of 60FPS might give very different experiences depending on how consistent the FPS are.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They may be able say something like “50% or users run the game at 30fps, 40% at 40fps” or something like that, where you can guess about different settings people are running at.

      The biggest thing is just knowing whether it’s possible to run the game on your hardware at the minimum acceptable fps. If average fps for a steam deck game is 25, you know it doesn’t run well. If a significant number of deck users are able to average a higher fps than 30 (40-60), you know the deck can run it decently and you’ll have options besides running everything on the lowest setting.

    • Maiq@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re gonna have to take into account for programs like lsfg-vk, Decky-framegen and others that increase frame rates. Easy to do on the deck though just ignore reports from games that have the programs launch option. Cant do that with my laptop though as lsfg-vk just grabs the process by name.