• 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    We were told this in a recent dept meeting:

    We are not talking about replacing you or me by AI, no no no. We are talking about acceleration. To accelerate and change our ways of working and this is mandatory — yes or yes. The colleague — it doesn’t mean just this dept — that doesn’t use AI for their daily work next year, won’t be in this company. And we will check it. This is the message: won’t be in this company. And i’m not talking because it’s me who orders this. No, it’s the strategy of the company.

    I’m sooo motivated to be working there…

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sounds like it’s time to make whatever AI the company has subscribed to, waste a whole lot of tickets on random shit.

      • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’d just ask the AI if this (whatever project I’m working on) looks correct. Then take whatever feedback it gives, whether correct or not, apply it, save it, and ship it. Sounds like what they want, yes? Give it to them. Hahahah.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I thought about malicious compliance but I don’t want the end-users to get a shitty product.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Makes you wonder how much they’re getting for selling your data to train AI. Makes you wonder why you can’t say training AI wasn’t on my job description and if you’re going to be adding AI Training into my caseload you should be paying me more. They’re getting a kickback, you’re getting more work and same pay and what are the AI Companies getting? More stable ways of removing you from the company.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Repos moved from local infra to an “enterprise” github account a while back.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Management is sometimes ‘true believer’, and only after the bill comes do they decide that maybe their employees shouldn’t burn as many tokens as possible anymore.

        They all picture it like AI is a great things and their employees are just not tech savvy enough to appreciate it, so all they have to do is make everyone have a taste and obviously everyone will both love it and become amazingly effective. Turns out that people generally do have a decent impression, for better or for worse, and forced micro management of it doesn’t boost morale nor productivity.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        They generally have a hook into the accounts the employees use to access the provider. So you can burn tokens and look ‘productive’ and have it have nothing to do with your work.

        A lot of the early adopters have already figured out that measuring employee usage just ends with big AI bills and essentially zero assurance that the AI provider was used productively. Those folks discontinued things like leaderboards and review based on tokens consumed.