• GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Even if it’s open for a couple of weeks, no ships will sail, because the insurance companies won’t cover until the war is fully over, and without insurance they can’t dock anywhere or do anything.

    Completely pointless, just finish the fucking war, that apparently you won weeks ago. WTF are Americunts still doing there?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      so we lost lost all progress in limiting irans ability to create nuclear weapons in order to stop them from creating unuclear weapons. Well thats definately all trumped up.

    • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 day ago

      So basically the US lost is what I’m reading here. Not even a ceasefire just a straight defeat.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Look, let Trump save face. Let him gloat that he won. It’s better than him bombing innocent people.

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not even a ceasefire just a straight defeat.

        Probably why it won’t last, or at least violated several times.

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can literally read the word “ceasefire” if you open the article lmao

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A ceasefire were you don’t achieve any goals, and the opposing side gets major concessions is a defeat.

          The Iranian regime survived. The nuclear programme survived. Iran now has the right to charge tolls on an international strait. The US is negotiating an withdrawal from the Middle East. Iran will get rid of the sanctions. And in they will get reparations as a cherry on top.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            i am presuming it’s a lie, but i would prefer defeat. kind of hard to keep a ceasefire when one party notoriously does not recognize ceasefires

    • chosensilence@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 days ago

      wait what ahaha seriously? this is going to be the most “we actually lost” victory Trump is going to declare. can’t wait for him to call this “deal” (no lmao) a peaceful cessation of power and a success. iran couldn’t get more out of this if they tried.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It reminds me of that scene from the newer All Quiet On The Western Front when the diplomats negotiated an end to WWI.

    • knotRyder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      So this 2 weeks is just them ending it and it’s over and we’re just going to forget about it because that’s how the news cycle works and then this never happened Jesus f****** Christ murica lost again but the billionaires won cuz they made money on this by rug pulling the world’s economy why do we live in capitalism so people can do this

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, I think some good came out of this. Mostly evil, but some good.

        I’m looking at (used) EVs seriously now. I’m betting a lot of other people are also trying to move to EVs after the nth price shock in x years. This one went at least as bad here as the start of the Ukraine war.

        Also there are now politicians in Germany initiating discussions about restarting some of the nuclear plants if possible. My own country sadly isn’t too progressive on these issues, most people want shale rock to be brought back rather than additional wind turbines being built, since there were some points during the winter where there was no wind when it was really cold and electric prices shot through the roof.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          why are we destroying our environment with shale rock when we can destroy our environment with hydroelectric and get waterskiing out of it

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            We’ve already dammed the like 3 rivers we have. We just don’t really have any major ones here :/

            We do have copious amounts of shale rock and it’s pretty much the only natural resource we have that’s worth the money to mine. Which is why a lot of people aren’t happy about reducing it.

            But even fossil fuels aren’t as reliable as people seem to think. The fancy new shale rock generator has been down as much as it has been up. They keep investing more money into it. Yay taxes.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump will start to walk back on this the second they sit down and possibly offer “personal gains” they just cant refuse. Iran will just walk out and all this shit will continue.

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think Trump would agree to #6. However, Trump could explain to Iran that ending sanctions would enable Iran to rebuild. #2 and #5 require explanation. Trump would probably agree to letting Iran having sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, but they would have to keep it open. Iran would have to agree to any UN resolution banning it from developing a nuclear bomb.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The reason for doing so is that we have already met and exceeded all Military objectives

    Ok, so you don’t need a ceasefire, you need to just fucking leave.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      2 days ago

      The ceasefire is while theyre finalizing the peace agreement. If its all true then its standard.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you think peace just magically gets signed one day and people pick up and leave that day? Obviously the process incudes a ceasefire to give time to finalize things and withdraw.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Actually, often, yes. For example, there were people fighting and dying “in WWII” after a peace agreement had been signed. They didn’t stop for a ceasefire and then negotiate a peace agreement. I would wager this is the norm, rather than a ceasefire while peace is agreed to.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              WW2 ended with Hitler killing himself and Germany doing an unconditional surrender. Thats a lot different than two sides who are still capable of fighting deescalating from conflict to peace.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Yeah… no. That was VE day only. Also, Hitler dying did not end the war. An agreement still had to be made. WWII ended with the surrender of Japan. Some soldiers were actually fighting for many years after, but still, the average one didn’t get the news until after it was done.

                Meanwhile, WWI fighting ended with an armistice which, while not a full peace agreement, is a declaration to end hostilities. This did happen in a day also. That wasn’t a temporary ceasefire leading into it.

                Again, I’d wager this is how the majority of wars end, especially when communication was slow. The ceasefire seems like mostly a modern thing from my understanding. It’s only really possible with instant communication.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yea but this chain is about having completed war aims so you should just up and leave instead of signing a ceasefire and finalizing peace. Isreal still says theyve got work to do and was still fighting. Plus isreal attacks from their home so they cant up and leave.

    • spacesatan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I know you guys really love your twee little catchphrase but how did he chicken out when his demands were met? Iran are the ones who folded, at least for now.

      **oh nevermind, Iran is saying he agreed to their 10 point plan. If that’s true then lmao, the whole civilization ending thing was probably staged to let him save some face.

      ***if it’s not in reference specifically to today’s deadline to open the strait then the subtext of saying TACO here is that you’re calling him a coward for not continuing the war. weird take but ok.

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        when his demands were met?

        were they?

        Iran did not give up its uranium, nor was there regime change. The only thing he got was getting the strait open, but that was never a problem before the war he started.

        • spacesatan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          I assumed they were saying he chickened out of today’s deadline to open the strait. Which doesn’t make sense because Iran agreed to that specific demand. I did not consider that maybe they were calling him a coward for not doubling down and continuing the war.

          Sure I guess you can call him a coward for not doubling down and not technically be wrong. Wouldn’t occur to me to do that though.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        2 days ago

        Did Iran fold? They are firing missles at Israel, like right this moment

        • spacesatan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          40
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The demand was open the strait or get bombed, they agreed to open the strait as a condition of the ceasefire.

          This is like getting mugged, handing over your wallet, and then saying ‘hah, I knew you were too much of a coward to stab me.’

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            2 days ago

            Do you remember why the strait was closed in the first place.

            This is like knocking over someone’s sand castle, getting your ass beat for it, they agree to stop if you rebuild the sand castle, you do and declare victory

            • spacesatan@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sorry I thought “trump is a coward for not doubling down and doing a ground invasion” was too stupid of a position to take. I assumed they were saying he chickened out of today’s deadline to open the strait.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                2 days ago

                It is, the right position is he should have never started it the first place. Now he’ll scream victory and leave. Only costed millions, if not billions, of dollars and thousands of lives. Such success

            • spacesatan@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ok, it’ll make sense to say XD TACO if they reneg and Trump doesn’t follow through. But they’ve agreed to open the strait or there is no ceasefire agreement.

              • ProIsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’ll bite, where is them agreeing to open the strait? I’m not taking trumps word here.

                • spacesatan@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  consider at least reading the headline of the post you’re commenting on

                  *“agrees” heavily implies two parties. CNN is not such a clickbait rag that they would have framed it like that with a looming deadline less than 2 hours away if it was just trump saying some shit unilaterally.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        Have we actually heard anything directly from Iran about this, or just Trumps blabbering? Just because Trump said it doesn’t make it so.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            Wasn’t the strait technically open “in coordination with Iran”? Drop them a couple mil and you get through.

            • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Exactly, they were already coordinating with various countries to let ships through. I believe the number of ships has been steadily increasing. Every agreement Iran makes cements their newfound sovereignty over the strait including this ceasefire.

  • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    What bothers me is that the Iranians seem to take this bait literally without being too critical. They’re basically saying that they’re ready to open the strait right away for negotiations to happen, even when Trump bombed their country during the previous ones. I think they will come to regret this.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Take the bait? Look, playing chess with a pigeon is difficult. Given the terms listed out, someone took bait, but I don’t think it was Iran.

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump wanted an off ramp, but ultimately, it was Iran that handed it to him. Probably won’t do much else in the end but buying time.

    • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      What do they have to lose though? The moment the US starts bombing again the missiles start to fly. It’s tit for tat. That’s been their strategy this whole time. I don’t think they expect the US to take negotiations seriously at all.

      I do however think Iran wants to appear reasonable to the rest of the world. Under the ceasefire, they still expect other countries to coordinate with them to get ships through. That was already happening prior to the ceasefire but now it’s clear that’s what they expect from everyone. They’re forcing the world to acknowledge Iranian sovereignty over the strait which is a pretty serious win if they can keep it.

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What do they have to lose though? The moment the US starts bombing again the missiles start to fly.

        What they lose is momentum. Oil prices, which is basically the only thing the Trump base cares about, are already falling, and if the ceasefire ever breaks, it will take quite some time to build them back up again. A lot of countries are already making plans to diversify away from the Gulf to mitigate that risk, some are looking into pipelines to avoid the strait altogether. All of which diminishes what leverage Iran has.

        A second closure of the strait of Hormuz will much, much less effective.

        Secondly, the politicians, journos and billionaires who supported that war on Iran are still very much here. This is far from over. The Americans will be back; not tomorrow, maybe not even this year, but when some opportunity arises again. This war was Iran’s chance to engrave into the American psyche some Vietnam-like PTSD every time they hear the word “Hormuz”, to make sure they never, ever try an attack like this again. With this ceasefire, they’re forfeiting that too, further allowing the US to buy more time.

        • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not sure they really lost momentum. They are still exerting control of the straits by enacting a toll, something they had already begun doing. A two week ceasefire isn’t enough time for countries to replenish their oil reserves and secure alternative energy sources. What they probably need to do now is extract concessions that allow them to rebuild and become even more resilient against US intervention. If they get even half of the 10 demands they laid out as part of the ceasefire agreement they’ll be in a more advantageous position long term.

          The question I have right now is, will they resume firing on Israel now that it’s clear Israel has rejected the terms of the ceasefire? Everyone knows negotiating further with the US and Israel is pointless. Iran needs to show that if their demands aren’t met there will be consequences. If they don’t aid Hezbollah, that would be a sign they’ve lost momentum. It could mean that they aren’t confident enough to include their allies as part of the tit for tat strategy they’ve followed throughout the entire war.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes someone needs to warn the Iranians that this administration doesn’t always negotiate in good faith, they’re clearly not aware of that possibility.

    • Fetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe Iran will commit to the ceasefire in the same way Israel committed to the Gaza ceasefire?

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They will. All it will take is a few drones from Iran atracking Israel after the cease fire and then the narrative will be “Iran violated the ceasefire, bombing will continue and now Europe has to help keep the strait open”.

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their Foreign Minister did reply to the proposal, promising to open the strait, their only leverage, for the duration of the negotiations.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is not their only leverage, though it is by far their strongest card.

        They’ve proven that they can destroy the energy infrastructure in the gulf, if they have to go full scorched earth. They’ve also proved capable of hitting Israel very painfully, and while it’s nothing compared to American bombs, the Nazis in Israel have a very low tolerance for any attacks at home, they can’t sustain a genocidal war when the victims aren’t mostly children and can actually fight back.

        They’ve also already inflicted heaven losses on the US military, not to mention proved that they’ll come out on top in a war of attrition.

        The only way the US/Israel can truly defeat Iran is with nukes, and while I do think Trump is stupid enough to do it, hopefully enough sane people can convince him that that’s not the victory he’s looking for.