sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agoRepublican bill would order ISPs, DNS providers, and VPNs to block piracy sitesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down11cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1211arrow-down1external-linkRepublican bill would order ISPs, DNS providers, and VPNs to block piracy sitesarstechnica.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square36linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareeleitl@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoSo the expensive infrastructure for DPI that that takes, who’s going to pay for that? And just where are you going to buy it? China?
minus-squarethejml@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoHonestly, they’re likely already doing it for surveillance of their citizens anyway.
minus-squareeleitl@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoSurveillance is cheap, filtering/blocking with DPI is not, and has plenty of false positives, see Russia.
So the expensive infrastructure for DPI that that takes, who’s going to pay for that? And just where are you going to buy it? China?
Honestly, they’re likely already doing it for surveillance of their citizens anyway.
Surveillance is cheap, filtering/blocking with DPI is not, and has plenty of false positives, see Russia.