• sakuraba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    what else can you expect from the company funded by “They trust me. Dumb fucks” Zuckerberg?

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 hours ago

    And I just wonder how many times this has happened before, but gone unnoticed or swept under the rug.

    • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Something in this article strikes me, and that is the “download” part. Downloading this data was protected by internal security checks… But what about accessing the data without downloading it? Is that fine?? How much do these employees actually have access to? Most users probably haven’t enabled the message encryption.

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        they have access to everything, the issue pointed by the article here as you stated was downloading it

        • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          i don’t know why it surprises me… I know that the data is not encrypted, and that it is stored on their servers, but still, I thought the users had at least some minimum of privacy, at least from individuals working at Meta.

          • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            well in theory they have controls to access this data now but i don’t trust them anyway

            back then it was free for all, just like Tesla employees watching people having sex

            • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I worked for a call center 10+ years ago, and if I searched for customers, which I had not talked to, in our internal CRM system, it would be flagged in an internal system, which potentially could end with employees being fired. I was an inbound customer service rep, and the only thing i thing i could get access to was their name, address and their phone bills… So, yeah, it just surprises me that the policies around accessing “private” data is so Laissez-faire.

              • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                yeah it is wild, i dealt with similar policies when working as a support agent for Epic Games: we had access to certain info from every user but everything was logged and suspicious activity was very often reviewed

                my guess is that support agents like myself were outsourced, so they had to comply with these policies and i suppose it is the same right now with meta and their moderation staff

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 hours ago

      When the NSA does it it’s fine.

      When Facebook does it to train it’s models it’s fine.

      When individual employees do it it’s fine until the government notices and raises a stink. Then it’s a problem.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This seems like oddly quaint news. My assumption for years has been that they are all doing the same thing.

  • usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    These are the companies we’re supposed to trust they’ll implement Chat Control or similarly intrusive technologies properly.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Seems people have to relearn this lesson every few years:
    If you don’t want something to be public, don’t put it on the internet. “Privacy” controls from these companies fail regularly, sometimes by design. If you put something on the internet, it will be public eventually.