• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hard no. Parking shouldn’t be bound as a necessity to every real estate, but every car ownership (see Japan).

    There of course is an argument to make sure there’s enough parking per let’s say square 100m for everyone who’d need it for their car (even more so if this free’s up the damn road), but mandating an available car parking space for any real estate would go the wrong direction.

    • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh I mixed it up. Thought the whole “parking with real estate” was mandatory there, but it totally makes sense to connect that to car ownership.