• ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    So… Not because “that’s a privacy tool, conducting public business there is antidemocratic”.

    Instead because, “look at how those Americans use it wrongly, we don’t want to be like them.”

    . . .

    Huh. I have mixed feelings about this.

    • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      No not really. More a “its not the right tool for the job” signal is a messenger for private use, EU is working on / has a matrix based messenger that is more suited.

      You still want encryption but also central user management etc. (Which hopefully also includes archiving…).

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Sounds like a decentralized encrypted messaging platform is needed.

        And when you need the highest trust, you just need to make sure you and the people you are talking to are all on trusted servers.

        so governments would use their own gov.eu server or something, and only communicate sensitive info to others on that network so the info never leaves that server