I believe that this assumes precedent matters. The other thing this court has declared is that precedent means nothing. That’s the important take to have if things are going to get fixed.
I was wondering the same thing. They keep declaring the previous supreme court wrong. Why do they get to be the final say then? If they are saying a supreme court ruling can be wrong, why are we even bothering with these idiots.
I believe that this assumes precedent matters. The other thing this court has declared is that precedent means nothing. That’s the important take to have if things are going to get fixed.
I was wondering the same thing. They keep declaring the previous supreme court wrong. Why do they get to be the final say then? If they are saying a supreme court ruling can be wrong, why are we even bothering with these idiots.