“What’s funny about that is they assume my ambition is positional. They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever.”

  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Im pretty sure that is a “no, not this time” answer.

    I think she knows where she can do the most good, and survive to do the most good.

    I like AOC but i dont think she is ready for the international political scene. I think she knows it as well. Domestic issues need her more, which happens in Congress.

    And Jon Stewart, well i like him too but … another celebrity/actor president? Really?

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      At this point I don’t care. Trump set the bar so low that a colony of fermenting yeast would do a better job.

      Let alone someone with actual good intentions.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You cannot give weapons to Israel and say you have good intentions. But if we reach a point where actual democratic orgs can tell her what to do, her personal intentions aren’t so important.

          • MBech@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Before and during the primaries is exactly where these issues should be highlighted. Both to find the candidates with as few dead bodies in their closet as possible, but also to force the candidates to publicly address these issues.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The bigger issue is that presidency usually is a final political position with the only one people take after it being supreme court justice. She may worry that young representative with integrity won’t be replaced with another

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      celebrity/actor isn’t the issue.

      It’s the content of one’s character. Jon Stewart has already proven himself very aware of the political state and being able to bully Congress into submission on behalf of vets and first-responders.

      So yes, this is not a non-starter in any way shape or form, if we know they’re intelligent, authentic, charismatic, and empathetic.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Im just saying the past 2 were Reagan and Trump.

        So maybe the 3rd time will be the charmed one?

        Reagan sure sold authentic, charismatic, and empathetic vibes to get elected. And he had the Bush family push.

        Trump just sold intelligence (dont ask me how), charisma, and empathy to the dumbest and the bigoted. The wealthy and the supremists were already on board.

        Jon may well have all 4 aspects down, but he is too close to the establishmemt democrats and the financial economy, imo.

        Kinda wish we had a peanut farming, nuclear engineer that we could turn to.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          But can we try two celebrity Democrats for a change before making up our minds?

          The problem is more they were conservatives; less so their celebrity status. All Republican presidents sucked since Ike, celebrity or not.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I see the problem as the financial sector having the reigns of both parties national commitees.

            And remember the DNC can just pick who they desire, no matter the primary process.

            At least nobody is suggesting Oprah this time.

            Stewart’s brother is/was COO of NYSE iirc. Not to shame anyone, just saying there is a connection there.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think she’d be great because she would hire very smart people to advise her on her weak areas. “If you’re dumb, surround yourself with smart people. And if you’re smart, surround yourself with smart people who disagree with you.” She’s smart, and she knows a lot of smart people.

    • belunos@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      100%. Both her and Stewart are in the exact positions they need to be in to be the most useful to our country. Stewart gets the views of the center, while she works on progressive projects, where she can. Politics gets folks emotional, but it’s best to plan from reason.