• CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m a liar how? I said that people should be using the ballot boxes anyway, and you said “watch them seize those too” even though it’s much easier for them to seize the mail since it goes through a federal agency, thus why I said they should bypass the federal order by using systematic and efficient placement of dropboxes. Because guess what, the order only applies to the mail. It doesn’t apply to the ballot boxes. I’m not sure what your real argument is at this point.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said:

        People should have been using the ballot drop boxes all along anyway.

        You said:

        They do

        So I said:

        Then, according to you, this order wouldn’t affect anything?

        Then you said

        No liar

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well the availability suitability and usage of drop boxes varies by state but nowhere are they exclusively used and many voters don’t have limited to no access to drop boxes nor will be certain to be able to change this in purple states which will be dispositive.

      We can’t route around this we have to fight it.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You are conveniently leaving out where I said that it can be fought or evaded with efficient and frequent placement of ballot boxes.

        That is fighting it.

        What is your suggestion, then?