• JuvenoiaAgent@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I remember using XSLT to make my site’s RSS look good around 20 years ago. I thought it was so cool, though XSLT was awful to write.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not entirely sure what the “maintenance burden” even is on a tech that hasn’t changed in decades.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        From the article:

        Google says it’s removing XSLT to address security vulnerabilities. The underlying library that processes XSLT in Chrome (libxslt) is an aging C/C++ codebase with known memory safety issues. Chrome’s team argues that because only about 0.02% of page loads use XSLT, it’s not worth the maintenance burden.

        It’s debatable whether Google, with all its resources, really needs to do this, especially given that 0.02% of all page loads is still quite a lot. But there are certainly times when it’s better to just delete seldom-used old code from your project to lower the maintenance burden and reduce the surface area for attacks.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m a little confused about this. While I’ve been using RSS feeds for several years, my only experience with RSS feeds is with Inoreader. Will this cause issues with the way that I’ve been using RSS feeds or will I be unaffected?