• LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Doesn’t it fuck up the binding? Sure, a softback is still going to stay together in the immediate term, but the covers are almost always a single stronger piece, whereas the pages will now be free to work loose from the cut side.

    So… I’d say it is objectively worse.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It doesn’t need to stay together for a lifetime, the person only cares about it staying together for a few days till they’re done reading the section, after which it gets disposed of. This makes it much easier for them to actually read it, which means it’s objectively way better.

      • jmill@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        You…buy a book and then throw it away after you read it? Anyone does that?

        • Beacon@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I don’t, but plenty of people do, and it’s entirely fine if that’s how they want to read