while I don’t approve of the method, leaving this person basically stranded and without indictment. I want to differentiate that the person in question is not a good person
The person seems heavily bound with Russian desinformation, ties with RT, and foreign letterbox company, to circumvent sanctions.
Then got caught in the consequences of the freezing of Russian assets after the Ukraine war.
I doubt this person is as innocent as your meme makes them out to be so let’s differentiate please.
German comes along to explain why being anti-genocide makes you bad. German thinks your human rights don’t matter if you’re the wrong kind of person. Pretty typical.
I think context as always matters when looking at things. Generalising things at seeking easy truths is when we leave out the nuances and these matter.
Let’s focus for example on what I said vs what I didn’t say. I didn’t say a person exercising free speech is a problem, I said the person had ties with Russian state propaganda. Which I even explained with sources. Here are some more:
Your next point, after indicating generalizing all Germans are the same, was that I said this person(and all persons) doesn’t deserve human rights, vs what I actually said, they should have an indictment, where they would have a chance to appeal against.
If they said you’re a dipshit therefore you’re wrong, that’s ad hominem, that’s not what they said. You are wrong and don’t know what an ad hominem is, you dipshit.
while I don’t approve of the method, leaving this person basically stranded and without indictment. I want to differentiate that the person in question is not a good person
links in German:
https://taz.de/RT-nahes-Medium-Red/!6039623/
https://archive.is/t60qm
The person seems heavily bound with Russian desinformation, ties with RT, and foreign letterbox company, to circumvent sanctions. Then got caught in the consequences of the freezing of Russian assets after the Ukraine war.
I doubt this person is as innocent as your meme makes them out to be so let’s differentiate please.
German comes along to explain why being anti-genocide makes you bad. German thinks your human rights don’t matter if you’re the wrong kind of person. Pretty typical.
I think context as always matters when looking at things. Generalising things at seeking easy truths is when we leave out the nuances and these matter. Let’s focus for example on what I said vs what I didn’t say. I didn’t say a person exercising free speech is a problem, I said the person had ties with Russian state propaganda. Which I even explained with sources. Here are some more:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(Fernsehsender)#Ukraine_und_Syrien
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_(Plattform)
Your next point, after indicating generalizing all Germans are the same, was that I said this person(and all persons) doesn’t deserve human rights, vs what I actually said, they should have an indictment, where they would have a chance to appeal against.
Your ad hominem fallacy tactics are childish.
If they said you’re a dipshit therefore you’re wrong, that’s ad hominem, that’s not what they said. You are wrong and don’t know what an ad hominem is, you dipshit.