themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squarefox2263@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoYet?? They’ve been making it since the Stone Age. I read about it in my teens
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoRight? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoWhy change it if it works? What is so bad about NTFS?
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoWhy use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Yet?? They’ve been making it since the Stone Age. I read about it in my teens
Right? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, Btrfs, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
Why change it if it works?
What is so bad about NTFS?
Why use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Because 4GB file limit?
exFAT then