• TimothyOilpants@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are a multitude of social, legal, and economic policy changes that need to happen to make societies more resilient against this kind of culture war shit in the future. For extant populations the only way to de-radicalized them is with education, whether that’s voluntary or otherwise.

    I’m certainly going to get down voted to oblivion, but the Chinese model is worth looking at. No civilization in human history has provided a higher standard of living to a larger population of individuals.

    I like the idea of a true secular humanist end state, but as populations explode, I think we need a system that can function and deliver value at scale first; then we can gradually expand technological and ideological infrastructure for more direct democratic decision making.

    It strikes me that finding ways to expand ideological freedom and democratic participation in the Chinese model would be orders of magnitude easier than scaling something like the Nordic model to more than a billion people.

        • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was told by a person who is a bit more cosmopolitan than me. However, with all the back and forth in the comments, and knowing that China has digital comm restrictions, we’ll never know unless we spend a lot of time there ourselves. One way or another, there is probably propaganda involved.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I looked into the electricity thing, apparently in 2014/2015 they reached essentially 99% coverage. They all have water but the issue is how clean the water is. Like 70% - 80% is questionable.

        Don’t get me wrong, China definitely has its problems.