They ruled that for copyright to apply, a human must have authored the work.
Now if an AI spits out code that’s a duplicate of a humans authored work. Then you could argue the author is actually the original human. And this it would be covered by their original copyright
Nope. Courts decided: AI output is never copyrightable.
They ruled that for copyright to apply, a human must have authored the work.
Now if an AI spits out code that’s a duplicate of a humans authored work. Then you could argue the author is actually the original human. And this it would be covered by their original copyright