• JackTea@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is for Americans. Let that sink in. WE need these warnings…and a lot ( and I mean A LOT) won’t see these warnings.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No we don’t, because it wasn’t approved in the US until the late 90s and only for treating VERY specific cancers.

      It was pushed out in West Germany in the 50s specifically as a morning sickness med while pregnant, which is why these warnings are on there.

    • QuietGenesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Are you trying to say people in many countries wont see these warnings because of weak regulations for the pharmaceutical industry? I dont get what you mean when you say “WE (Americans) need these warnings,” because that sounds like youre saying Americans are so stupid they need the warnings when I would say that everyone should be warned about thalidomide side effects.

    • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      actually, the FDA refused to approve this drug, which is why we don’t have a generation of people with terminal limb deformities from it.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Huh… I don’t understand your point. So you think we should just know that this medicine is dangerous for pregnant women?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Eh, kinda a stretch to make this about Americans.
      In the original thalidomide problem it was the same ‘paranoia’ that kept it entirely off the market in the US.

      Beyond that, I’m not sure I get the reasoning behind "Americans are so dumb that they put safety and usage instructions on cancer medication, with emphasis on the most severe warnings!”
      Why wouldn’t you want to label dangerous things that are actually, uniquely hazardous?

    • espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reminds me… back in the 90s I had two Miatas, one imported from Canada and one from the US. In the operating manuals, one difference that stood out in the US manual was the inclusion of a warning to not stand while driving.

      Those poor Canadian Miata owners didn’t stand a chance, did they.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m wondering due to the size of Miata why an American would think they could stand while driving.

    • espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I believe, in general, it’s a lot harder to hold a company liable for your own stupidity in Europe.