• jeffep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    “treated as an antisemitic incident by NGOs”

    What is that supposed to mean? Greenpeace categorizes this as antisemitic and as a result…?

    I don’t know, I’d find it more infuriating if the press or police or judges would do that. But NGOs sounds like a bullshit headline to be

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      Palestinians were being lured to food aid while the ngo employees stood by and let the IDF slaughter them. The more you know.

      The important and relevant questions are: which NGOs, and why weren’t their names published?

      • jeffep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Palestinians were being lured to food aid while the ngo employees stood by and let the IDF slaughter them.

        Not going to deny that, but what does that have to do with some nazi mf attacking some guy while having a tattoo?

        And in particular: wtf do any unnamed NGOs have to do with that shit? Catch him, arrest him, put him in front of a court. In the meantime, report about it. No NGO necessary

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          NGOs are way too often a front for actual government malfeasance, NED, for example.