Immigration and Customs Enforcement has made yet another arrest at a New York City immigration court, despite a May ruling from a federal judge that broadly blocked such detentions.

U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, a George W. Bush appointee, ruled May 18 that ICE never had the legal justification to make these arrests. His order, which applied to immigration courts in Manhattan, kneecapped the agency’s controversial strategy of detaining people as they arrived for mandatory immigration hearings.

Despite that, ICE has made at least six arrests in Manhattan immigration courts since Castel issued his order. The latest arrest came on Thursday, when agents detained Bronx resident Matar Ndiaye while he was “dutifully attending an immigration court hearing for his asylum claim,” according to court filings.

Contempt charges?

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    2 days ago

    Police providing security at the courts should be arresting those ice agents for kidnapping since they don’t have jurisdiction, but we all know why they don’t.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hmm, an unaccountable paramilitary force that flouts the law without consequences? It’s getting really really fascist in this motherfucker.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      And people are still doing nothing about it, and no, protests are not doing something about it

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What do you want to be done? The smart but feels bad move is to keep taking notes and keep taking names. The regime won’t last forever and a blue wave is already coming.

        For now, the thing being done will be more court fights between state and federal (aka notekeeping).

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they’re legally officers performing arrests in the fascist USA.

      For the newspapers of the USA to call them kidnappings would be libel.

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The media is not on our side. They can’t even put “illegal” in the title; they just soften it with “despite court orders…”

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, and yet here are commenters whining that the media should step up and solve their fascism problem with accurate reporting.

          The media won’t solve it, the courts won’t solve it, voting won’t solve it, “someone else” won’t solve it.

          The US citizens acting in coordinated industrial strikes is all that will solve it currently, yet they don’t. Another year or so and even that won’t solve it.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The first couple of paragraphs of the article explain why these are not legal arrests. ICE are legally forbidden from doing this, so their actions should legally be treated the same as if anyone else just grabbed people and imprisoned them.

      • Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s decidedly not legal, that’s the point, they are breaking the law

    • Abyssian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s brown, so if he makes too much of a stink NYPD will fire several warning shots into his back while he’s “aggressively” tying a shoe.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, given how he capitulated to the NYPD, I’d imagine he can’t do much. I somehow doubt he would be allowed.

        • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          He’d campaigned on reining in the NYPD, but as soon as he was elected he specifically started praising them and hasn’t done anything to curb some of the… well, more problematic elements. It is assumed that they threatened him or something, because him doing nothing about them goes against his supposed worldview and what he campaigned on. It’s very well possible that the realities of being in office or just that his ability to affect things as Mayor isn’t as powerful or robust as he’d thought. In any case, it’s one of the few elements of his campaign he’s gone back on.

          • raze2012@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hard to say. Mamdami has a lot of work to do and reforming the NYPD during these times is one of the larger tasks. That might be more for something during his 2nd term if he gets that far.

            But I wouldn’t be surprised if he got a lot of flak internally over these issues once he got in.

            • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh yeah, I agree. I think it’s dumb to expect everything to get better overnight. The fact that he’s done as much as he has is amazing.

      • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most people have no choice but to capitulate to an organized and armed force, regardless of station in life.

        It’s an important lesson. One the working class should take to heart.

  • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is all theater. The courts will hem and haw about rights and rule of law but ultimately wont do jack shit all to cement the SS…sorry ICEs position above the law and ability to take who ever when ever they want from where ever.

    • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re not wrong. The court was complicit as they can declare the “arrests” illegal.

      Minor correction, these aren’t the SS they are the SA. This is why we need to fight now, they’re not yet organized enough to be the SS, they’re still forming. We still have a chance to create enough political pressure to disband them.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      2 years down the line and they’ll issue the third final warning to stop doing illegal things, which the appeals court will immediately stay because a few months without optimal inductions into the concentration camps is considered an irreversible harm.