• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I predicted KSP2 was going to be eventually abandoned and IG closed around the time of the launch, when the first industry layoffs were starting to happen. The mildest thing I was called for suggesting this was pessimist and it only got worse from that term. I suppose I was half right…so far.

  • meleecrits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I remember the first time I successfully landed on the moon and brought my kerbals back. It was one of my most cathartic experiences.

    It’s sad to see the sequel get abandoned like this.

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s sad to see the sequel get abandoned like this.

      Especially when KSP has had such an active and vibrant community for a decade

  • rbos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They abandoned Linux support. Fuck them. It was one of the only games that did. Linux users were a bug part of their initial success, and they dumped us as soon as the money came in.

  • AlexisFR@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well another studio took over from Intercept Games to work on KSP 2 a while ago, right? Star Theory, iirc.

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is Kerbal Space Program 2 worth playing for someone who had fun with but was bad at 1?

    Reviews are - not good.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nope. It’s hot garbage and I say that as someone with over 2000 hours in KSP.

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s terrible. They released an Alpha at full price. They changed how building rockets was done, for the worse. Performance was horrible even on my 3080 and aside from prettier graphics, there was nothing really new to explore. If it were cheaper, I’d be kinder. If it performed decently I wouldn’t mind but they released a POS of a game knowing full well KSP1 owners would buy it and it made us all look like suckers. They knew they released an incomplete game at full price and didn’t deliver. That sir is hot garbage.

    • ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      In its current state? Not unless it gets heavily marked down (KSP2 does have better tutorials and a more accessible progression system).

      With the studio being shut down, it’s likely that what we have now is all we’re getting.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hmm maybe I’ll check on it in 5 years. Cos holly hell that price! Priced like a AAA game.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Why are we defending publishers and letting them get away with using this term this way? The term should be earned for its content and quality. AAA should not mean “large studio”.

            This whole “we are a AAA studio”, when they haven’t even made a game and got the business license the day before is fucking stupid as shit. Don’t use the terms the way they want it to be used.

            • Err(()).unwrap()@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              What are you talking about? The “AAA” classification has always been a measure of corporate involvement and budget, not of quality. If you think that being large in scale and having good production quality is what makes “AAA” games, you’re dead wrong.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                What other industry uses the term that way? Every other industry is quality. AAA to refer to size…. Right….

                I know that’s how the term is used, it’s just fucking wrong when every other industry uses it differently……

                Don’t let them get away with this shit. You are defending them. Notice how your link even says informal……… they are trying to make it a thing, when no other industry uses that way, and other people in the industry are calling it out.

                You’re trying to defend this stupid shit.

                If you continue to use this incorrect term, it will become a thing, that’s what they are hedging on, people like you letting this happen. AAA means quality, they aren’t putting out quality product so they are trying to change what the term means so they look good. Way to eat that shit right up.

    • Hubi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not really, the first one was better in pretty much every single regard.

  • orl0pl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I hope that they will share the source code on some kind of GPL to make this game not dead, shot down studio isn’t going to make any update and who will get the money?

    Edit: they will still make the updates

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Take-Two still receives the proceeds from the sales, depending on employment contracts probably pays royalties to the devs. Also, it’s their intellectual property so there could be consequences for leaking the source code.