• switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t like this at all. For multiple reasons. For one, everyone should be allowed freedom to travel without their fucking governments permission. Fuck that. You don’t own me. I’m not your property.

    Also don’t like that it insinuates the need for more military personnel. Aka potential war.

    And fuck if it ain’t my shit hole country that’s causing this to happen to our once-allies…

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That does not sound consistent with EU regulation, that should guarantee free movement within EU.

  • Vittelius@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    While the law requires men to request the permit, the [army] spokesperson clarified, it also obliges the military career center to issue it, if "no specific military service is expected during the period in question.”

    "Since military service under current law is based exclusively on voluntary participation, such permissions must generally be granted,” the official added. (…)

    When asked, the ministry spokesperson pointed out that "the regulation was already in place during the Cold War and had no practical relevance; in particular, there are no penalties for violating it.”

    • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a rather standard thing in any country with compulsory military service. Typically you get that done with right when you’re 18-year-old and then you’re free to travel.

      In Finland it’s handled so that you cannot get a passport before you either finish your military service or have turned 30. That meant that when I wanted to travel with my brother outside the EU before they were 30, we were limited to countries such as Albania and Georgia that allow entry with just an ID card. (And also, had we wanted to destroy the climate by flying, we would have needed to fly the flight out from the Schengen area from some other country than Finland!)

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which makes sense but Germany doesn’t have compulsory mil service. Yet. I guess this is a step in that direction.

        • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it does. At least I kept hearing “als ich mein Zivi gemacht hab” when I lived there. Most people elect to serve in the form of civil service instead, but civil service is a type of military service (as weird as that sounds).

          But maybe it’s very easy avoiding the whole thing altogether? I don’t know all that precisely, really. My “military service” was done in the form of civil service in a children daycare centre by the time I moved to Germany. And I’ve never been a German citizen anyhow.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            And that’s how it should be! It should be mandatory, and we should have it in the US too. Two years once you turn 18. Get people out of their local bubbles and show them what the world is like, make them useful citizens.

            • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 hours ago

              USA is only waging wars of aggression. It would be horrible forcing people to that shit, IMO.

              In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence. When the US military should see military action, is decided in D.C.

              But when the Finnish military should see military is decided in Moscow.

              If your wars are something you fan decide about, it would be extremely immoral having compulsory military service.

              In countries that cannot decide when to not have a war, it’s immoral to not have compulsory military service, as that would mean only the poorest having to bear the brunt of the war.

              • rzadkie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 hours ago

                In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence.

                How self defensive of them to occupy Afghanistan…

                • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  …and Iraq, true.

                  Though, at least Finland sent the absolute minimum to both of those shitstorms, and that only after being blackmailed by USA. But zero conscripts were sent to either one. Especially the shit about Iraq is something I am really angry about.