VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 8 days agoDoesn't add updiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up11.5Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.49Karrow-down1imageDoesn't add updiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square153linkfedilink
minus-squareCrowAirbrush@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·6 days agoKids are put there out of necessity for a second wage and then that entire second wage gets gobbled up, see the irony there. It’s not working.
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 days agoWhat? Nothing you said was ironic… Or made any sense.
minus-squareCrowAirbrush@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoI’ll explain it slowly, parents need a second wage to pay the bills as a result of this their kid gets put in daycare which they rather didn’t. But then that daycare eats up that entire wage, leaving the parents in the same spot financially but now without time or energy.
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 days agoIf you’re trying to say that parents need a second job or supplemental income to pay for daycare you might be correct. Maybe, probably. I don’t know. But that has nothing to do with what I was saying.
minus-squareCrowAirbrush@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoNo they need a second wage to pay the bills. As a result of that the need for daycare arises, then that daycare gobbled up that ENTIRE wage in my country. It does not work. It costs too much. No matter how much you justify the cost from the business point of view.
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoI don’t know what country you’re in. I’m in America and that’s what I was basing my comment on. Which is what the original post was commenting on. Maybe in your country it’s different and overhead for daycare is Non-Existent… I don’t know. In any case your disbelief doesn’t make my statement untrue unless you can bake up your claims with some kind of evidence. Instead of “nuh-uh”.
Kids are put there out of necessity for a second wage and then that entire second wage gets gobbled up, see the irony there. It’s not working.
What? Nothing you said was ironic… Or made any sense.
I’ll explain it slowly, parents need a second wage to pay the bills as a result of this their kid gets put in daycare which they rather didn’t.
But then that daycare eats up that entire wage, leaving the parents in the same spot financially but now without time or energy.
If you’re trying to say that parents need a second job or supplemental income to pay for daycare you might be correct. Maybe, probably. I don’t know. But that has nothing to do with what I was saying.
No they need a second wage to pay the bills.
As a result of that the need for daycare arises, then that daycare gobbled up that ENTIRE wage in my country.
It does not work. It costs too much. No matter how much you justify the cost from the business point of view.
I don’t know what country you’re in. I’m in America and that’s what I was basing my comment on. Which is what the original post was commenting on.
Maybe in your country it’s different and overhead for daycare is Non-Existent… I don’t know.
In any case your disbelief doesn’t make my statement untrue unless you can bake up your claims with some kind of evidence. Instead of “nuh-uh”.