• AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, I’ve seen that. I’d prefer to have more information before loading the article or - for whatever reason - following a link to another discussion on a different instance.

        You could also just post the links with no headline if you think you’re giving too much information up front. See how that works out.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get that. I used to do that and the mods of this community deleted my posts for doing so. They claimed something about fair use. I really don’t care to figure out what each mods arbitrary notion of fair use is so I just don’t do that here anymore intentionally. As I would rather share the news than not.

          • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Your post just can’t be copyright infringement. You were posting the entire article. Just post a couple of paragraphs. It ain’t that hard - just look at other posts in any of the news communities. If you make an effort at fair use, no one is going to delete your post. Just do 3 paragraphs or less if you’re really worried about it. Easy.

              • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Then so much of the article that the difference between that and the entire article is trivial. Same solution though.

                You’re posting good articles from good sources. The mods aren’t looking for excuses to remove them. But the admins also shouldn’t have to take on legal exposure they aren’t comfortable with without consent.