• she worked for OAN, a known russian channel, and developed a relationship then in which “they talked all the time.”
  • she refused to get a background check multiple times for a security clearance
  • she’s his “gatekeeper,” per the other staff
  • she wants in on every conversation as per her letter
  • she thanks him for her “coming of age,” whatever the fuck that means
  • she was one of the few people that went with him in the plane that wasn’t supposed to get blown up.

And as another poster said, she claimed trump cured her cancer. https://sh.itjust.works/post/65459998

  • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.socialEnglish
    810·
    6 days ago

    off topic: that picture screams AI to me…
    i totally agree with everything in the post text though

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOP
      131·
      6 days ago

      It’s not AI, it’s Ivanka with a lot of botox and her rival who probably had a lot of plastic surgery so she could look like Ivanka.

          • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.socialEnglish
            61·
            6 days ago

            of course ivanka is on the left and natalie is on the right, i’m not doubting this or their similarity.

            but what I’m doubting is the image composition, that has them both looking in the same direction, same expression and same background.

            to me, this could be an indication of a prompt like “compare ivanka’s and natalie’s similarities side by side”. and that would be problematic again, as the ai model might over exaggerate the similarities. and that puts us in the territory of manipulation and fake news.

    • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
      102·
      6 days ago

      Can we all just stop calling AI on things when there is no reason other than they look like airbrushed mannequins. It’s as bad as calling every old photo AI because of compression or blur.

      *In addition to being annoying, it cheapeens the accusation when you use it with no cause.