It’s hard to read because of how it’s written, but you likely have to read it backwards. People can bear arms, why, Because states may need a skilled well regulated militia.

They already announced it, they’re likely half replaced already

Those services don’t cost anywhere near that. You’re getting fleeced.

Doesn’t matter. All you have to do is use at least half and you break even.

You gonna share your discoveries with the class?

Not sure I agree. I think it’s likely too much for an adult as a sole source even if it’s good for children since they get so much more input. I’ve tried and I needed a lot lot lot less and slower input. Sometimes 20-30% speed. Don’t get me wrong, I love the concept and I wish there were more high quality resources for this. But I think most adults need to start more basic than basic TV.

Most languages have zero resources for comprehensible input.

What color is the wiki page around it then? Ultra white? Or even in dark mode the blown out lighting on the right side is white as well. It’s surely not the same as the dress. Just go get a crayon from the box to compare.

But they’re coming for everything. There won’t be anywhere to go to get information. You’ll give up everything?

If you’re getting the ads you’re there to watch something you wanted to watch.

They’ll start with sanitized versions of select excerpts and build up tolerance and indoctrination.

Which is fine. You’d think they’d just refine those further. Today we’d have ultra efficient tanks that take little water, little energy, and never break.

That was horseshit with multiple different pictures being used with different levels, confusing people to death about what others had reported seeing. It’s easy to white balance the blue back to white which with the yellow orange lighting reflections on the black, saturated up the yellow lighting to look more gold. Nobody with normal vision both looking at the same original picture claims the blue part is white.

Outsiders can agree all they want about that fact, but truth is created in small rooms it seems, and that truth can be very different than day to day reality. The rules of the game that were setup are complicated, and the players are currently still willing to play even though they didn’t originally know or imagine playing the game this way themselves, it seems to them to be a valid way to play. The regular people also play along, because of the rules of the game, even though how it’s played has changed, and some rules they thought couldn’t be changed can be, so they don’t all like playing anymore, but they are always the first to try to leave the game, so there are many guard rails in place to see that they cannot disturb the real players too much. Even though they could… Generally they don’t. So no, sanity is not politics, but that’s already baked in.

2+2=5 is not politics. Politics is a game of power, popularity, and persuasion, not math. If everyone in power says no, then it’s no.

You can’t prove a cover-up for mental failings when that person is getting up in front of everyone and talking on a regular basis. You might think it’s evil talk, you may even think it’s nonsensical babbling most of the time, but a shitload of people don’t think that. There are no consequences possible because this is an active choice, not a surprise outcome with a cover-up.

Our screens aren’t wide enough to show where the current boundaries even are.

What the fuck could even be offensive these days that hasn’t been explored to death.

They really mean this was fun, but they’d like a more effective version of the same.