• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2025

help-circle
  • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzMy eyes!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    It might reduce dryness-related pain, or wash out any dust or eyelashes that were causing irritation. Unless you are sensitive to the preservatives, saline solution would do the same and be more convenient. They have single-use saline packets for people with preservative sensitivity, but those are kind of pricey, so I can see the case for boiled water.

    People get weird ideas and can be stubborn about them. My father spent more than a week using Clear Eyes in an attempt to moisturize. (Clear Eyes is a product to reduce red appearance, is not meant to improve eye comfort, and causes rebound irritation as the blood vessel constrictor wears off.) It took multiple talks after his eye irritation was only getting worse to convince him to switch to the actually moisturizing drops the eye doctor had given him.


  • Charity food and health care is generally accepted as a good thing. By contrast, the idea of some kind of UBI (universal basic income) as a floor - where a person could have food and housing while pursuing a dream like creating art - is widely opposed (“paid work gives dignity!”).

    Disbelief that our distant ancestors paid labor “taxes” to support artists in their community (which they definitely did) might be some psychological projection.


  • Public support fractures if the questions are broken down into more detail. People have unfounded fears of new “death panels”, and founded fears of the government screwing up implementation (Canada has crazy wait times for many medical services - it’s an outlier among developed countries, but demonstrates the screw-up opportunity). People support new services if they are funded magically, but aren’t willing to support tax raises, even though the tax increases would be less than the savings from not paying for private health insurance.

    The complexity - and partisan politicians being more than willing to weaponize confusion over details to divide us against each other - is the barrier.


  • Global population growth is happening. Slowing down, but looks inevitable for at least several more decades. Given that baseline, it is optimal for all countries involved to allow immigration from countries with population growth (reduces strain on government services, adds to the economy with remittances) to countries with lower birth rates (tax revenues support social service budgets, increased entrepreneur rate of immigrants increases job growth, etc.)

    Economies can transition to population decline while maintaining standards of living for sure, if handled in a planned way. Some short-term pain during the transition, then fine later. But why go through a combination of short-term pain right now, at the same time as incredible cruelty is required to keep out migrants?

    A path to degrowth will be needed globally in the medium-term future (finite planet), but trying to implement that now at just the US locally isn’t going to help the planet at all.


  • Knitted socks were a huge deal when they became a thing in the 1500s - enabled by smooth uniformly sized thin metal knitting needles, which were just then possible with metal technology. We take for granted now that socks are stretchy, but for most of human history socks were stiff like any other fabric without any elastic threads as part of the fabric blend. Or sometimes cloth wraps were used instead of a shaped garment - the Russian military didn’t replace portyanki with socks until 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2013/jan/16/russian-soldiers-replacing-foot-wraps-socks

    The somewhat similar process of nalbinding was a thing as far back as ancient Egypt, and became common for socks and mittens in Medieval Scandinavia, but isn’t as flexible a technique as knitting, and doesn’t seem to have ever been used for gloves.

    That knitting (and thus knitted socks) was invented in the 200s (when the dodecahedra were made) - and was used for gloves, somehow, and not socks - and yet didn’t make societal waves until the 1500s is a wild idea.