I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.

Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?

Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).

I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.

Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.

I imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.

In theory it’s legal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat

I can’t tell if this is supposed to be for or against glyphosate?

There’s some irony in that sponsor block has to block four segments of the video.

Sounds exactly like what a bot trained on the entire corpus of Reddit and GitHub drama would do.