If you are truly serious: this is not how hallucinations work. It’s really best to think of it as “fancy auto complete”. The hallucinations happen when the next token is too disconnected from what we as humans would call as “belonging together”. But it’s all math after all.

Limit the k value, tube down temperature and cut off context size and the issue of hallucinations is a non-topic for “transcribe and summarize”.

You get into what I’d call “stupid” territory like you’re describing.

Your second point I fully agree with and is the reason why I’d ask the doc directly. To give the personal anecdote: the transcript itself helps me to focus on exactly the topics you’ve described: who’s confused? Where was agreement? Where did people just not speak up?

A specific hallucination example I see every other day for example are tasks: that thing “thinks” that “we should” or “you must” are always tasks and outcomes which is utter bullshit - but I know that and using the transcript part helps me focus on the important part, the humans.

Counter top the popular opinion here for me it would be a clear yes in the situation you’re describing.

The relationship with my direction doc is more believable to me than principles of vague bad feelings for me.

Now taking and transcripts specifically are one of the use cases I also draw value out myself. I’d ask the doc though how they’re using it.

Still I’d rather have my transcript public than to go on that search for a doctor match again.

They (US politics) literally do though, right? At least that’s my impression as a non US person.

If my understanding is correct it would need an overhaul of the constitution to change that, right? (The part about representatives of states cascading to select the representatives who then select the boss).

I’m quite uneducated though in US politics so perhaps I’ve got something completely wrong!