Anything thats not directly necessary for survival. So junk food, hobby items.

But those were significantly smaller groups of people with significantly worse quality of life.
In addition the ones that got bigger naturally evolved centralized governing structures. Even before that all the groups had leaders or some group(elders) making decisions that can effect the whole group.

Cleaning a outhouse after 50 people from time to time, isn’t that big of an issue and can be done just for the good of the whole group. It can be easily done in rotation or a group just gets together in an afternoon and digs a new one.

Doing the same after 100 000 up to 1 000 000+ people is in orders of magnitude more difficult and time consuming.

Same applies to any governing structure. Even the idea OP brought up needs a governing body of some sort to allocate resources and work plans.

https://radianjeans.com/ By the pictures seems to be fitting a whole phone.

https://www.amazon.com/womens-jeans-deep-front-pockets/s?k=womens+jeans+with+deep+front+pockets

Of course it’s questionable how deep each one is.

https://www.gap.com/shop/jeans-for-women-with-front-pockets-0agz00a

At least some seem to fit a whole hand.

https://www.reviewed.com/style/features/womens-jeans-deep-functional-pockets

Whole review pointing towards multiple brands with deep pockets.

Or yeah in extreme case to make a point to manufactures. Starting to buy mens jeans en mass for a while, but as people aren’t a hive mind. That’s kinda harder to achieve.

Because women still mostly buy jeans without pockets. There isn’t a strong enough financial incentive for manufacturers to add pockets to womens jeans.

If you want to change it then start buying jeans with pockets, easily available online.

Yeah it makes sense and I’m not actually that much against the idea. I’m not that fond of the current wage slavery system either.

I just don’t trust general populations altruism that much to believe it would work on a large scale without any sort of a positive Incentivization in addition to just keeping the society running.

It would be kinda entertaining to watch, if it were contained, but everyone gets hit with the shit he throws around. Even outside USA

That seems kinda too idealistic view of the world.
I know much more people who, if not directly forced, would let the dishes or basically any environment around them completely mould and break down before even considering cleaning up even just the mess they have left behind, than people who altruistically do clean up after themselves and others.

I do agree that living in a cleaner and nicer society should be enough of a motivation and for some it is, but there’s not enough of us.

We can already observe it in many public spaces where trash gets left laying around even if trash cans are available or public bathrooms or showers or my favorite example in the gym where plates get constantly left on the machines and cable attachments just piled up wherever those fell.

Fair point, though i did try to use positive encouragement model to incentice people to work in not so enjoyable jobs. Even if not permanently, maybe in rotation.

Some yeah, but undoubtedly not enough to keep it working. For example i doubt that many people enjoy working at garbage disposable or basically any waste disposal. Of course these jobs should be fully operated by machines. Or any assistant jobs in manufacturing or jobs that operate in shifts.

Society would collapse.
While working out of enjoyment instead of necessity is a noble and good goal. There are jobs that no one enjoys. Money can be used as an incentive to motivate people to work on jobs that aren’t that enjoyable, but still necessary.

Fair, i always forget that.

Fair point, at least those are reasonable benefits.

Location specific average, of course that changes based on location. Not that it’s bad, just that it’s noticable because it stands out from others. Like if everyone were to wear black clothes and one person wears red, they would stand out. But different shades of dark grey or even just darker colors, would be unnoticeable difference.

Even before I went on testosterone you could probably tell if I’d shaved from 20 yards.

But that was the point, unless actually focusing and looking for it. It’s completely unnoticeable from that far away. Unless far away from the average, maybe up to the level of average guy, though even that would require actual focusing on the person and then specifically their legs.

So the other person had a point. It becomes noticable only when fully focusing on the other person and specifically their body at which point it has to be a rather intimate situation.

Why else would you give that much specific attention to other person?

Breaking a bone in my big toe and then subsequently stubbing it weekly for months. It calmed down just to once a month after that.

As the [excluded statical anomaly], it makes no difference.

Unless the hairs are really thick and dark, outside of the average, those aren’t that noticable or at least it requires active focusing to look for those.

Basically randomly walking on the street or just doing basic daily tasks and the difference is unnoticeable.

Id argue the otherwise.

Based on the hair being unhygienic point of view.

With modern soap and washing capabilities, it’s rather easy to keep oneself clean, even with long hair. So shaving everything off serves no purpose, just extra work for no benefit.

So basically guys are jerking it to extreme makeover show?

It’s not the printers themselves that are evil. They were just made this way by their overlords.

So nice. Barely starting to recover from the last world wide supply chain crisis to get hit by another. FFS