• The only material thing it seems to do is create a new private cause of action that would allow anyone to challenge voter rolls. What does that look like in practice? The proposition text is silent on that.

• It says the government shall use “best efforts” to verify citizenship using various records and databases. That’s an unreasonably low standard and an unreasonably vague process.

Season 5 Episode 10: Lucy and Ethel set up a fake charity and collect donations from the neighborhood.

Season 2 Episode 5: Lucy has been stealing money from the Ladies’ Club treasury.

Season 5 Episode 25: Lucy accidentally breaks the bank at the Monte Carlo casino

Anyone else think that he says “Pope,” like he’s speaking to someone named Pope?

they routinely demonize conservative women who refuse to conform to the molds that the left tries to force us into

The lack of self-awareness is truly astonishing.

You’re hired.

What are the CO2 canisters for?

Your neighbor’s open wifi.

“Did you get all that?”

Yes

No <

When I googled that was the list I got, but I know that California, at least, still has in-person voting too.

California has “universal mail-in voting”, not “mail-only”. Meaning every voter is eligible to vote by mail, not that in-person voting is unavailable.

What states are “by mail only”?

The lunch arrangements will vary greatly by age/grade level. A high school is more likely to have the canteen style while an elementary school is more likely to have the cafeteria style. In either case, bringing a lunch from home is also reasonably common.

No matter how well you understand the passage of time in the abstract it’s a shock the first time you meet a full grown adult, with their own keys and everything, but you can remember what you were doing in the year they were born.

Grandma knows what she’s doing.

I don’t think you understand what “mass murder” means.

But that’s not what it means to the public

I know that. That’s why I’m saying something.

Maybe Sean Spicer will take the job back? Someone check the bushes.

It seems like you’re advocating mass murder.

I’m saying that the bombing, etc. of Nazi Germany was a justifiable level of force under the circumstances. I’m splitting hairs and making a big deal over the difference between “force” and “violence”. I think it’s important to know exactly where that line is so as to avoid stepping over it, so I’m not just being intransigent and clinging to a minor point here.

The guillotine symbolizes to me a clear stepping over of the line from justified force to mob violence. And I think we would be better off if everyone shared my opinion.

It looks like you ninja-edited in the second part of your comment. I was responding to the original that only had quotes of prior comments and nothing else. That would have been a low-effort comment not really worth responding to.

was it a mistake to bomb, kill, and invade nazi Germany?

No. But it would be a mistake to start bombing political rallies today, for example.