• 27 Posts
  • 2.21K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2025

help-circle



  • I don’t know… I know that consumer protection is pretty much non-existent in US but a price of a product is still a price of a product. Let’s say they want to go all-in, ignore the law and just charge everyone whatever they want. They would simply put a price 10% below real price on every sticker and charge you something else at the register. They would say that the price on the sticker is approximate and you have to identify yourself to know the real price. After scanning your consumer cart or your credit card they would show you the final amount. It would be way simpler than to put digital stickers, track the movement of every customer in real time, use face recognition to identify them and adjust the prices close to them. Technically they could do all this but for what? Why develop some hi-tech solution when a simpler solution is equally illegal? People would be pissed either way so they will do it only if they know their customers have nowhere else to go. I don’t see any reason to play a game like that. Occam’s razor: they want to change prices at night.

    P.S. Unless they want to change the price for everyone in the middle of the day and the stickers are there so only first 20 customers are surprised at the register and start complaining. The rest picked up the product with the new price already… This makes some sense but it would be done in rare cases like unexpected weather change so they increase the price on umbrellas or something. But yeah, I could see that happening.




  • I thought about the exact same thing. Exactly like Super-Kamiokande.

    (A guy who thought us about Super-Kamiokande and neutrinos at my university showed us his photos with Bruno Pontecorvo taken at some ski resort in Soviet Union after Pontecorvo defected to USSR and the whole world was trying to figure out where he was. He worked on Manhattan project and allegedly help Russians build their atomic bomb. He never admitted to working on it but he did come up with the theory of neutrino oscillation which was later proven by Super-Kamiokande.

    My other professor played basketball with Fidel Castro.)




  • Russia is not planning on invading and conquering the whole Europe. The want to disrupt supply chains and divert resources going to Ukraine. Russia already has a lot of military on the borders with NATO (for example Finland). They are just sitting there not helping them win the war in Ukraine in any way. So Russia would like to:

    1. Force NATO to gather more resources on their side of the border instead of sending them to Ukraine
    2. Test if NATO members are actually willing to fight to defend each other (we know USA won’t)
    3. Disrupt supply chains and destroy factories used by Ukraine

    Crimea was overtaken by Russia without officially sending any troops. It was all done by some independent “mercenaries” that went there to protect Russian minority. (later Putin admitted it were in fact Russian soldiers)

    NATO is worried same thing can happen in Latvia or Estonia: small number of “mercenaries” engaging with the tiny armies those countries have. Other worry is long range missile attacks on critical infrastructure. So far NATO members did not respond to drone attacks and terrorist attacks on their infrastructure. Russia is checking how far they can go and so far NATO let them do anything without any consequences. It’s clear Putin will keep escalating (why wouldn’t he?) and what everyone is saying is that EU should be ready for the next step: direct attack.

    Putin doesn’t have to win it. He just has to divert enough resources away from Ukraine for it to pay off. Every drone that flies into NATO means more air defense systems in EU and less air defense in Ukraine. Same with everything else.