go. seed. lord. cum.
😐
“seedlord” is bad enough by itself btw.
Seriously though, I like the approach, but the reason games do that RMT pay to win stuff is because stuff costs money.
I’m not really interested in browser games. The concept with the economy sounds good, but the website is very “bare”, no images, no videos, etc…
A new report
BY THE AI COMPANY “WRITER”
and research firm Workplace Intelligent found a massive portion of workers across the US, UK, and Europe are intentionally trying to sabotage their bosses’ AI initiatives.
Please don’t spread obviously doctored “reports”.
The thing I’m concerned about is not the absolute number when news like this are published, but the magnitude of the error. Not in a “haha, they’re so wrong, lol” way, but in a “if they get it this wrong over x years, I wonder what the error will be in 2x years”.
“Combining observations and climate models suggests a 60% stronger weakening of the Atlantic circulation than using models alone.”
Being off by 60% is massive and then new estimate will have some margin of error as well. Which could go back to the original value, but it could also be worse. We just don’t know.
What are these checks that you need to do?
My perhaps unknown hero of pdf processing is https://mupdf.com/
If it’s in the data somewhere it should be detectable. They’re an open source project, maybe bring your issue to them and they can make something?
Sure, I get that, but right now what the public can see is just the idea, as written text with like 2 pages. It’s the concept of a game. And it’s a decent concept, but there is nothing else there yet.