

Who gets to decide what’s on the ticket and what’s not? The party?
In so far as the party chooses the candidate to put on it and the platform they run on, yes. Unfortunately, both major parties’ leaders are genocidal and rather set in their ways. Rig primaries, ignore popularity of progressive candidates, you know the deal.
then the thing that separates the US system from a one-party state is that we also have a brazenly fascist party looking to undermine democracy at every turn.
In one-party states, democracy has already been hollowed out, so in a roundabout way:
is the presence of the Republican party the thing that makes the US system more democratic?
It signals that there is still some democracy left to undermine. However, if the Republicans were wiped off the electoral map, people could still vote third party, form a progressive opposition and attempt to wrest control of tne Democrats thay way, while a one-party state wouldn’t even have that option. Granted, handing the Democrats full control would be a bad idea too, but it serves as illustration.
This is just once again asserting this ideological framework of lesser evilism that I reject.
Maybe I’m just fundamentally misunderstanding what your moral framework actually is.
Once they start committing crimes, you stop caring how many they commit, because at that point it’s all just evil? Your response to the Trolley Problem wouldn’t be “I divert it to save lives” or “I refrain because I can’t condemn one person to death”, just “What does it matter? People die either anyway.”
Is “voted for someone who would have supported genocide” a worse offense than “DOGE gutting government agencies, ICE terrorising citizens, illegal tariffs sabotaging economy to the detriment of the people, participating in genocide, murdering civilians to drive up oil prices, all the while attempting to ensure that nothing - no vote, no protest, no attempt at insurrection - will ever stop this or pry loose the claws of the winners of capitalism, but at least I get to wash my hands in innocence”?
Because then I will agree with those who think your ideology is stupid, not for its motives but for its short-sightedness. If it is more important to you that you have a pristine conscience than that all the people fucked over by this regime, then I hope the moral high ground protects you from leopards coming to eat your face.
You don’t even want people to voice their opposition to the existing parties, much less to the system in general,
I think you have confused me with someone else, because I very much criticise this system as being fucked, which is also why I advocate for building support for change from the bottom up: A new system needs to be set on a foundation more solid than “lesser evil”. In local, municipal, primary elections, expressing support for progressive candidates is crucial, because the stakes for losing to the Spoiler Effect are generally less severe…
even in a presidential vote
…except in a presidential vote in a system that is way too top-heavy anyways.
that, for the vast majority of Americans, not living in swing states, is a meaningless symbolic gesture anyway.
If it makes no difference, absolutely, vote third party for the visibility, so long as you vote at all. Political analysts can only guess what non-voters want (or whether they just couldn’t vote), which makes apathy the worst illness to democracy: If you vote for something else, your vote at least expresses what you want rather than what you don’t.
It’s nothing but procrastination.
Then what do you call inaction? Or are you hoping it gets so bad people start revolting, but not so bad they can no longer revolt?

I adapted the normalizer Sink from that post to be a normalizer Source, replaced the local paths with the system lib names, made a mistake, fixed it, got everything hookes up as I think it should be. How it performs under load remains to be seen, and which order noise cancel and nornalizer go will be tinkered with, but at least the service restarts and everything looks fine.
May life be as kind to you as you have been to me.