“if you think about it” hehehe

Cool, sounds legit

The law is meant to be fair (which is a separate can of worms, but the goal is fairness). It is not meant to be moral, though it often follows what people generally consider to be moral, like don’t rape or murder people.

And, honestly, using the “reasonable person” argument here goes against your point - it indicates that people with different morals exist, and therefore morality must be subjective.

Honestly this is a pretty big topic in philosophy. It could be argued that morality is a human construct and therefore must be subjective.

Some people believe that not going to church each week is amoral, but some atheists think organized religion is amoral - who is right?

You and I can agree that murder is immoral. Would that stance change if we were on the jury for a murder trial and, if found guilty, the offender would be sentenced to death? If that doesn’t make us murderers, what makes the death penalty an appropriate and moral punishment?

Simply replying “false” indicates little to no thought on the subject or its nuance, and gives off strong “I’m 13 and this is deep” vibes

I freaking love my xc90

I fucking hate it