Or they could articulate how unstrategized bombs would help anything.
But are those actually unstrategized? Often times individuals and groups doing these kind of actions actually coordinate, have some kind of debate & reflection process and use in depth knowledge to actually hit pretty relevant targets.
Also I think its pretty obvious how sabotage is helping: the direct consequences are very easy to grasps and measure, like how long a certain thing didnt work or how much the cost of repair was. So until there is an actual mass movement that is able to accomplish similar feats via strikes etc., those sabotage actions are in a class of their own when it comes to achieving direct results.
Or why scary dangerous bombs more likely to blow you up are better than a gun made from like 10$ in filament for anything that would matter.
Probably because the use case is different? With a gun its hard to actually destroy things, they are made to harm humans.
But I agree, bombs are very dangerous for yourself and people die trying to build them / put them to use.



How do you find out if your name is being googled?