I guess it was misjudgement saying Trump is smart for doing so, when he could just… not start a war and tried other disruptions instead.

I did want to ask if war is going to end and Trump is getting away with it, but decided to go one step too far (maybe for virality? Dumb me again)

So much for me believing there is truly no stupid questions.

deleted by creator

Is this opinion piece implying that quantum computing researchers should stop researching because current quantum computers are currently less than proof of concept? Is technology supposed to be fully mature from the beginning?

I don’t think this is matter of mathematics, it is difficult to define what “software only running on desired machine” is. Like, do you permit functionally equal software with different code? With painstaking effort, functionality should be approximated fairly close (although idk what that means in mathematical context) On the other hand, requiring exact code is likely not what they want.

Cryptographic guarantee requires mathematical specification, which seems ill-fit in this scenario.

The article seems to be saying that Microsoft is losing favor of investors, not that they began losing money or something.

Don’t get me wrong, I would love Microslop to fall down, but… I do not get how failing to satisfy finicky slop-loving investors is “death to Microsoft”.

Huh, interesting that pop could be realized this time.