Of course not. My head is spinning because I don’t want to accuse anyone here of not acknowledging Gaza at least as a Palestinian quasi-state. Hitler systematically killing Jews in the pre-1939 borders -> genocide NOT war. Hitler systematically killing Jews in Poland, France, Romania, etc., etc., etc., -> genocide AND war. That doesn’t change anything about genocide being terrible in both cases. Allied troops marching onto Berlin: War but definitely not genocide. I repeat: Are y’all saying that Israel is not violating a territorial border when marching troops into Gaza? Because it does feel like that’s what y’all’re saying. I don’t really know what we are discussing here. All I’m saying is: There can be war and genocide without taking away from the other somehow. What is the point of saying that there were no war in Gaza? If one accepts for a second that there were no war in Gaza - just genocide: Who benefits from mis labeling it as a war, independent of calling it a genocide?

As for your point about resistance in Nazi Germany: I acknowledge that the distinction between local resistance and a civil war is a threshold argument, which are infamously hard to resolve. Resistance in Nazi Germany certainly didn’t have enough broad public support to call it a civil war. However, even if your argument is that Palestinian resistance against Israel were inconsequential, not calling it a war feels dangerously close to not recognizing Gaza at least as a quasi-state. If not war then how is invasion? Returning to my point above.

Of course Hitler invading and occupying Poland was an act of war, which enabled the genocide there. He couldn’t have committed genocide in Poland without first conquering it. I’m not saying there is no genocide in Gaza, I’m saying: It can be a war and a genocide at the same time. While not always, genocide is often enabled by war. What’s lost by calling it a war, independently of calling it a genocide?

I don’t think the Armenian genocide would’ve occurred without the Balkan wars and WW1; in this terrifying scale, anyway. However, quite like the genocide of Jews, Sinti, Roma, and other minorities in Germany at the hand of the Nazis, the Ottoman forces didn’t need to invade anywhere to commit these atrocities within their own empire. Steep argument: Doesn’t it deny Palestinian statehood to say that Israel were not leading a war on Gaza?

Hmm. I still don’t quite catch that argument. While there have been far more casualties on the Palestinian side than on the Israeli side, I can’t see how there isn’t an “Organized, large-scale, armed conflict between countries or between national, ethnic, or other sizeable groups, …”. Even if you argue that the Palestinian people does not currently exert sufficient and organized government control over a territory to qualify as a state, then it would still be a revolutionary war or a war of independence. Just because such an endeavor has not been successful yet doesn’t imply the struggle isn’t real. Genuinely trying to understand how calling it a “war” is false. As one counterexample, were the acts of the French Résistance in WW2 not part of the war, because they lacked central organization?

Sry, I don’t understand the red boxing here: Are you saying the word “war” in the summary downplays the word “genocide” in the title? Both can be true: You can have a genocide during and as a part of a war. Also, if any, the title is more visible than the summary, no? Placing more emphasis on the “genocide” part than the “war” part. Are you arguing that whatever is going on in Gaza right now does not qualify as a war at all? I had always thought that referring to the situation as a “war” and not just as a “crisis” or whatever strengthened the Palestinian cause, because “war” implies two opposing nation states, which implicitly recognizes Palestinian statehood; a thing that some western states are quite candid about.

Connections Puzzle #1110

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟩🟩🟩🟩

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟪🟪🟪🟪

Comments: one connection really stretches it…

Adding my personal notes on search engines here for anyone’s interest. I personally use Qwant on Desktop and DuckDuckGo on mobile. I like Qwant because they are at least working on their own index and are EU-based. On the other hand, DuckDuckGo is faster and has a more comprehensive privacy policy. I’m really trying to use Mojeek on mobile but the search results are much worse than DuckDuckGo and Qwant in my repeated experience.

Useful background:

• https://stateofsurveillance.org/articles/technical/blur-pixelation-censorship-false-security/
• https://undercodetesting.com/the-vulnerability-of-pixelation-as-a-privacy-measure/

Spoilsport :P

Erm… OP, you know that blurring is not destructive, right?

Connections Puzzle #1105 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟪🟪🟪🟪

First ever perfect connections 🙌 normally I find this very difficult.

billionaire tax backed by California governor and presumptive Democratic presidential aspirant Gavin Newsom

vs

Newsom, the California Democratic Party, and […] - are publicly opposing the tax.

and

Newsom said that the proposed tax “makes no sense” and would be “really damaging to the state.”

Huh? Wording?

Can you explain in a little more detail how enforcing online ID prevents WW3? Genuinely curious. The only thing I think of that national online ID might help with is counter intelligence, especially in defense against psyops. However, in the few cases that we do know about psyops toppling elections, e.g., Brexit, these were performed on behalf of or with the aid of party and government officials in the affected countries. If any, this would become easier, because widespread online ID silents dissenting voices, while well-financed entities can navigate and / or circumvent such regulation (also see, for example, the effect of GDPR on the market structure of attention merchants in Europe).

Introducing Athenian democracy: Place your name on a paper slip. Place that slip in a big bag. If your name gets pulled, congrats: You are now a politician for an allotted time. Also works with marble slips for extra flair.

Thank you for the context. Highly appreciated! I had gathered the gradual decline in funding and surveillance from this publication but they didn’t really talk about the damages done by COVID or DOGE.

This is the way

Demokitten

Then they should’ve included a short TLDR even harder

TLDR: Open package repositories without some approval and oversight system, like AUR, will have even more problems in the future due to advanced coding AI and malicious foreign hackers.

Edit: Please normalize TLDR’s on bot posts with just a link.

Edit 2: I have been rightfully informed that this is not a bot post. I still think links should not be posted without a tiny abstract, one might say: a TLDR.

I have also been informed that the text does not spell out “foreign”. This is correct. The text does say

Not all of the packaging issues are as bad as the initial wave of trying to steal credentials, some are just adding ridiculous messages in Russian.

This implies but does not establish the nationality of attackers. While Arch has contributors from all over the world, it is commonly cited as being a Canadian distribution (example, see below). https://distrowatch.com/table-mobile.php?distribution=arch

This would make for a pretty cool SCP: A place or a person whom you can’t get super close to, because space around them behaves in a fractal manner.

The answer is no, but the other way round: If your regular poop stays inside long enough, it produces diarrhea again. Google paradoxical diarrhea. And don’t try it at home.