Both is fine. Maintaining different datasets has the administrative overhead you mentioned, but can have security benefits, e.g. if you use different users in the different docker services and adjust the NFS permissions correspondingly. If service A gets hacked and escapes the container but doesn’t get privilege escalation, it can’t access the other services’ data.

This is independent of which version you choose, but check whether adding some storage to Proxmox is an option. Having TrueNAS as a runtime dependency for all your services can get annoying real quick.

Thanks! Makes him even worse (doesn’t change whether I think it should be in this community though)

Yeah it’s happening on one instance. Nobody has to adhere his call, where is it btw?

It’s good to call that shit out now and then in right place, but instance moderation is still moderation.

It’s what used to be called fedi meta. This sub specifically says it’s not about grievances with moderation etc. This post is clearly about a moderation issue. One admin who also happens to be a dev is moderating poorly - sure, but not what this community is about.

But it claims to be.

Even if you ignore the slur, the frogs and the rune in the background: Building a chat network with proper e2ee in a few weeks doesn’t sound good. It’s clear this is made with LLMs and I wouldn’t trust it’s everyone nat all.

Here’s some offers on professional support: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues

Yeah I like them as well, it’s what we use at work. The article doesn’t leave me optimistic though

It is but they’re working on federation for forgejo (which powers Codeberg).

If you don’t want to host something yourself, check codeberg

They’re usually tying their identities together themselves. You’re conflating changing your name to match your gender with using pseudonyms and are drawing questionable conclusions from that. Chelsea could also have pseudonyms that we don’t know of where she did/said other stuff but wanted to remain unknown. That’s not the same and doesn’t mean she doesn’t care about privacy. Her being known for the leaks is already something public, she does not hide it. In fact, she clearly says she doesn’t want to be referenced by her deadname as someone else quoted here.

There’s a community guideline “stay on topic” which you clearly violated (though one could argue it’s been violated earlier in that thread). Insisting on calling trans people by their deadname can also easily be seen as transphobic, which is against the general slrpnk rules.

Is there any documentation on how they share user data like emails? That sounds super wild to me

First, I don’t think calling out/talking about enshittification is off topic on a solarpunk instance. It needs to be identified and addressed to be avoided for our utopia.

I tried to get the gist of your post, you want to keep using Chelsea Manning’s deadname citing questionable reasoning, and the admin deleted your comment? Not your post on enshittification, but your justification for using the deadname?

Most people I know strictly don’t want their deadname seen anywhere btw. They use their new name for stuff they did before as well. That’s not too generalize, people are different, but saying the deadname should be used because they want to start over without looking any further how Chelsea applies it is nonsense. Your reasoning seems pretty far from what people who changed their names for trans reasons usually say about it.

The mod call seems right to me. Calling for a community removal because of one mod decision you don’t like is also usually not the best thing to do.

Anarchy has to be many things and some are more often overlooked than others. Some of the replies here show exactly that pointing it out is necessary.

Having all possible aspects of anarchy combined is a rather theoretical thing IMHO. There can always be new things which are used to discriminate people for and create hierarchies around - identifying and overcoming them has to be constant anarchist praxis.

But anarchists are, again and again. And since there’s no perfect anarchy anywhere but always just striving towards it, it’s necessary to point out blind spots. Dismissing that criticism as signalling is ignoring the fact that we have to learn anarchy, it doesn’t just come to us in it’s perfect form.

Lemmy is a small part of the fediverse and the tankie triad is a small part of Lemmy. Barely ever seen that stuff on Mastodon and co.

It doesn’t have to be a conscious decision like “disabled people fuck off”. It’s usually doing something without thinking to whom it’s accessible.

Establish your cool open for all anarchist library in a place not reachable by wheelchair? Excluding disabled people. May have an easy fix, but you gotta think that shit through, ideally before announcing how you’re open for everyone. Just one example.

Most anarchists may be cool about that in theory, but reading reports from disabled anarchists, exclusionary examples are far from being the minority. Masks or filters at indoor gatherings? Alt texts? Some openly published contact where disabled people can ask about meeting their needs? Just some topics that often aren’t though about at all.

Pretty sure as soon as you don’t have to sell your labor anymore to live a somewhat decent live*, you’re not working class anymore, independent of how that happens. Working class background or something.

* That’s a bit subjective of course, but at billionaires levels it’s pretty clear

How do billionaires “have to” sell their labor?

Very cool! Do you cut these by hand or is there some special device?