• 0 Posts
  • 52 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 8th, 2026

help-circle












  • If you want to take that position seriously, it’s outlined well in rancieres “the distribution of the sensible”.

    Politics can only happens around what we are able to experience, and what we can experience is predicated upon what and how we are able to sense, which makes all art inherently political, as a piece of art always imparts and improve upon the senses of the subject interarcting with it. You have an experience, you grow. Your distribution of what is sensible has shifted.

    To take it down a notch and relate it back to the current image, what do you think a Nazi would say, if you showed them this image and presented it as art? Good chance they’d see it as an prime candidate for the untartete kunst exhibition. It’s not realistic, uses pop-culture symbolism and even, dare i say it, contains such unholy additions as vulgar everyday language, not poetry 😱

    P clear then, that even the seemingly most innocent of images contain an infinite amount of assumptions around much broarder topics, fx, what is beautiful, what is allowed to be expressed, and those are very much political conversations

    Thx for coming to my Ted talk



  • You:

    “all relationships are unique, and there are no (there are, but there shouldn’t be) guidelines on what makes a relationship real or not […] build your own relationship however you want/need/able”

    Also you

    “I still think monogomy is unethical and it’s cruel to expect that of a partner” (paraphrased)

    Lol, lmao even

    Not very relationship-anarchic of you to hierarchisize relationships, with some being inherently more ethical than others