Vaccination is not mandatory in Romania. In 2015, responsibility for administering vaccines was shifted exclusively to GPs, increasing bureaucracy and piling pressure on to an already stretched system.
This here is the central issue, I would say. It needs to become a public health priority, in as much as to become mandatory practise and independent of GP appointments.
I’ve been using Letterboxd for a while now and am pretty happy with it.
Good thing we’re wiping the US’ ass after they shit the bed with Israel, never would’ve known what to do with the extra TP.
Feels particularly relevant after all the Stonetoss and Jago entries recently.
This actually sounds pretty reasonable. Thanks for bringing it up.
This guy wins his made up arguments all the time, then turns them into comics.
In that case, it would be Zeus. Jupiter is his Roman counterpart.
Then, they’ll just sob and cry for bailouts when people ultimately switch to cheaper chinese EVs after being shafted for the upteenth time by gas price hikes.
This artist shows up a lot on Lemmy and what I’ve gathered from his comics is boobs.
I’d say Democrats never learn from their mistakes, but there probably won’t even be a 2028 election.
Agree with your outlook, but I think it’s not too farfetched to give the benefit of the doubt to the speaker here and establish that pedophiles were used as an example (of people whose survival depends on their data not being breached), rather than a direct comparison. And he goes on to name being an executive to the secret services as another example (again, of people to whom hardened security of data is an imperative), but we’re not saying he thinks secure phones are just for people in secret services, are we?
He’s just saying, albeit rather clumsily, that their goal is simply not that level of hardened security, but rather privacy from data miners.
I don’t think he’s actually making the parallelism with pedophiles and security per se, but rather he’s making the case that his OS’ mission isn’t by default focused on that level of security or anonymity, but rather privacy and disengagement from companies who profit from your data being mined.
He mentioned pedophiles, as well as the secret service, right after, as examples of either criminals who need to be obscured from detection (maybe because it’s easy for the Epstein class to pop in someone’s head, nowadays?) or government agents that need to protect themselves from data breaches, and said his type of OS isn’t made with that level of airtight security in mind, which is understandable and reasonable, and something we probably all knew already. It could’ve just as well been terrorists and investigative journalists mentioned.
One could take his stance and engage in discussion on whether we need that level of security by default as ordinary citizens, or that even without exceptional circumstances, it becomes necessary in an increasingly hypervigilant society/government, but that’s a separate discussion.
We should have a little nuance in interpreting speeches like these rather than taking things this literally, especially when it’s coming from a direct competitor in the degoogling sphere, who would naturally gain from holding it up in the most unflattering light.
Bummer that they do that. Any platform that you can recommend that addresses that issue and is user-friendly?