• Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        They added a voluntary field for date of birth. Very controversial. Not at all like the address field that had been there for years or realname. Those are completely uncontroversial somehow. Unfortunately it got added during all this uncertainty with all the user I’d government overreach. And people lost their everloving minds claiming it was some sinister forced Id check. It was not. But all the craze around it launched tens of already dead systemD forks.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Worth mentioning that California’s and Brazil’s age verification laws were cited as a motivating factor in the pull request, the pull request author merger works for Microsoft and the author also did similar pull requests in other open source projects.

          Edit: it was the PR merger that works for Microsoft, not the PR author.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Well, yeah, because they added it because of the law. That’s not speculation, they said that’s why they did. I agree, if it was there before it wouldn’t have been out of place, I totally get you, but they said that it’s something they should add because it might be required by law in the future.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I wonder if Linux had been included in the law, would it have criminalised lying in your profile demographics

        • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Probably doesn’t help there’s also the existing fault line of ‘an init system shouldn’t be doing x’, systemd was always a magnet for partisanship.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            There will always be people thinking X shouldn’t do y. But you’re not wrong. Plenty of people absolutely just look for any reason to attack

        • notSys@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Fascism is when I can input fake birth date into my init system

        • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          What a shocker, such an optional date field indeed seems like a grave menace to all of the freedoms. You should make a merge request with an optional field for an user’s income, so that we may hunt the billionares and exterminate that vvermin with such powerful optional fields.