• mossberg590@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Real sys admins know this pain (rm suffers no fools) and accept the consequences of recovering from backups as pennance. No backups? Then you aren’t really a sys admin then, are you?

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Next time I’m about to criticize the judgement of a video game boss for having an exposed weak point with a neon orange glow, I’ll think about a sysadmin with no backups. Stupidity adds realism.

    • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Once I had to restore an entire organization from shadow copies because the IT director didn’t believe in off-site backups or using endpoint protection. The whole network got a ransomware that included the backups, but did not include the shadow copies on the main file server.

      At least I got to help them build a disaster recovery procedure, and pick out a new EDR.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, they are essentially file snapshots. Shadow copies in a Microsoft environment at least are basically file history without using file history. So when you modify a file when it’s enabled, it makes a copy of the last version of the file.

          But since it’s not meant to be a actual backup solution, it’s meant to be on a file-by-file basis. I think that means they had to go through and manual restore n a file by file basis