Say you were a guardian or parent and get to decide when a child can get a phone or use a computer and get internet with it. If you wish you can also install software and change router settings to what you see fit.

Some parents decide to forbid the internet completely, others are more relaxed. Some go the helicopter route, and some do not care whatsoever what their kid does online.

What is your policy on letting a child use the internet?

  • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wouldn’t allow them to have a phone at all until they’re around 12 to 14 (just like my parents). When it comes to the internet on a computer, the same thing would apply, but they can when supervised. If possible, their only web browser on their internet device will have uBlock Origin installed with custom block lists to prevent them from accessing websites they aren’t supposed to. I would also like software (whether I’d have to program it if it doesn’t exist or not) to prevent them from using their devices at bedtime. Not a father, but those are the basics of what I’d imagine I do. Expect one last thing: Roblox is completely out of the question. I don’t care how much they beg. It’s a predator nightmare so it would be completely banned

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As someone whose parents attempted to deny technology, this is an excellent way to make sure that your kid has a secret life that you know nothing about, can’t influence at all, and you’ll be the last person they come for help to if needed.

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is unfortunately true. Despite having an IT admin as a dad, it only taught me how to more effectively circumvent censorship. I went as far as using the 3DS browser to access stuff I wasn’t supposed to

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Limited time and very limited access to content, only content that is age appropriate.

    Use the device’s parental controls to limit apps, downloading, purchases, sites, hours available and total time allowed. Doesn’t matter if it’s a phone, tablet, or PC. LAN parental controls if available as a secondary layer of site blocking and overall internet blocking at internet curfew time.

    Been doing this for years. It’s a must. Parents are responsible for limits on mobile devices and content. Having the software do the limits is far, far easier than physically demanding the phone from the kid, shutting it off, or looking over their shoulder to see what they’re using it for.

  • EuroNutellaMan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No unsupervised access to any techno-gizmo until they’re like 7 or 8, besides a dumb phone to call me or mom or watching me play/do things, maybe play together sometimes or limit it to formative things. Ain’t no hypothetical child of mine gonna be raised by an iPad and cocomelon, and since I don’t necessarily trust other parents to raise their kids decently I would get them a dog or 2 to play and bond with.

    Then, once they start being old enough I will give them their own tower computer, obviously with Linux, privacy-redirects, limited access to the internet (I’m mostly gonna let them access games, wikipedia and stuff that is formative) and their access to YouTube is gonna be via FreeTube with channels I think they’d benefit from watching as already subscribed (plus whatever interest I know they have). Throughout the time I will be teaching them things, indulging their curiosity and gradually explain, reveal and open up things to them. Of course I’d also secretly monitor what they’re doing, not to judge but to make sure they’re safe, until I know they can safely navigate on their own. As for phones they’re getting something locked down with some custom ROM like /e/OS or whatever and just the bare minimum they need to function (Signal to talk to me and mom, calendar, alarms, etc). No social media for them, they at most get to see some of it via privacy frontends. I want them to grow up in a way that the internet is a place they can leave.

    Once they’ve teenagers and understand things I’d start gradually letting them do their own things and gradually giving them more access, allow them to make mistakes and be sure to be there for them to learn rather than just punish. The goal is that by 18, when they’ll have full access, they’re digitally literate and can safely navigate on their own, or at least be as careful as 18yos can be. At that point they’ll also have to gradually start paying for their stuff on their own.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You couldn’t stop them if you tried, which instead will result on them using dodgy methods to access it, which puts them at even higher risk than if you gave them unrestricted access.

    Teach them, teach them that the internet is both fucking terrifying and fucking terrific

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Education education education.

    Explain how the internet works. Explain companies. Explain evil intent and malicious behavior.

    Imo, if you put your child under surveillance that’s not the right way. If bad things happen despite good education, fine, introduce limits and guardrails.

    Don’t do things you wouldn’t want for yourself. Be consistent.

    Basically, do good parenting.

    • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      As much as I hate the idea of exposing kids to the ideologies and mass propaganda of the internet, I hate the idea of incompetent adults even more. Plus, exposure builds resistance to some extent. How are they gonna learn to think for themselves if they haven’t seen a wide range of views? Also, do you want your child to fail out of college the first time they play a video game? Or only start learning to code in their twenties? if ever since they won’t think of a computer that way.

      No way, if I was gonna have a brat, the little bastard would be damn competent at everything.

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I would love things down but leave increasingly difficult to exploit vulnerablitors so they can unknowingly learn more and more about networking and such

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    crontab, it’s enough to :

    • kill any add during specific period
    • accumulate usage per app
    • check if tabs are opened

    and it’s pretty straighforward to configure, e.g.

    * 8-17 * * 1-5 killall SlayTheSpire && date >> ~/shame
    # prevents from playing during weekday working hours
    

    or for accumulation (which can be reset daily, weekly, etc by simply deleting the minutes file)

    pgrep mpv && >> mpv_minutes; if [ $(wc -l mpv_minutes) -gt 1000 ]; then echo beyond threshold; fi
    

    That works also for turning up/down network interfaces.

    PS: I use this on myself. I’m not a child but I don’t have perfect self control. It works.

  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have an 11 year old son. He has neutered Internet that can do normal searches on. An hour budget a day for games. An hour for YouTube. Other than that he can talk to his friends on Discord or text. I check his Discord every now and then. He only talks to his buddies or my gaming buddies.

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    When they figure it out and become capable of reading and writing. Tablets, phones and computers are not locked down. Parental guidening and open communication means they know what it is, that there’s good and there’s bad content and people etc.

    Working great.

    /Swedish

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Access to the Internet is not something that the parents are actually capable of restricting. As soon as one kid in the has a phone, their entire peer group is exposed.

    The question isn’t about restriction. It’s about who will be teaching these kids about the Internet. The first kid learns from their parents; every other kid learns (mostly) from other kids.

    If your kid is the last in their class to have a phone, everything they know about the Internet they will have learned from their peers. They sure as hell aren’t going to tell you they already know about all the things you’ve been trying to hide from them.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Even so, less is better. Being exposed X hours per week through friends is still better than giving them direct access to a dopamine drip feed for 56+ hours per week (avg for teens in 2025). If they really want it, you can set limited access via a home desktop/tablet and teach the same digital literacy.

      A kid doesn’t need a smart phone in the same way that they don’t need their own car. They don’t need to go far distances with bulky items and passengers; they don’t need pocket access to banking apps and Slack. A dumb phone/watch can keep them in contact with anyone they could possibly need to talk to.

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    A friend had an excellent (but evil) one.

    His son had found some more… interesting areas of the internet (aka porn). He collected a selection of his browsing history and sat him down. They then went, video by video, having an open and honest discussion about it. Dad had FAR more tolerance for mortifying embarrassment than his son did. He learnt to clear the history at least.

    The 2nd discussion, 6 months later, used the router logs instead.

    I’m not sure I would use this particular method. However, it was apparently highly effective at making his kids think things through (for better or for worse!).

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wow, I’m not sure if I am more impressed at him pulling it through or shattering the adult trust by stabbing him in the back like this.

      I mean, if you (parent) didn’t tell him, how should he know? It’s essential to know in advance.

      • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, I honestly think that initial “Hey, don’t do this” talk is better in advance. I remember getting my ass whooped for saying “Fuck” as a kid when I literally didn’t know what the word meant and my parent put the video on in the first place.

        Educate your kids on what isn’t allowed in the first place. If they do something bad that you didn’t tell them in advance, then explain why the action is bad, not to do it again, and that you will be checking/monitoring for that behavior. Then you can at least be fully justified in any future punishments because you gave a warning.

        Punishments for initial mistakes and unknown wrongs just suck, and they kinda stick with you 🫤

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      this is good because it teaches the kid the importance of privacy and the entire lack thereof online.

      it’s also nice to not freak out at porn viewing and to teach them it’s ok in moderation.

  • BranBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Our policy was supervised / filtered only until early teens. Kids sites, educational stuff, games we purchased and approved of, etc. We were also late to give them phones, our son got his first because in his freshman year of high-school his band teacher set up a boiler-room to sell worlds finest chocolate and he was the only kid who didn’t have a cell phone.

    When we had “the talk” we discussed masturbation and porn, why porn is popular, and all the negatives that go with it without condemning it outright. We talked about online predators and not sharing things with people you didn’t know, especially pics, addresses, etc.

    My wife and I are firm believers that kids need space to discover who they are, so as they became teens, things went to semi-supervised. We paid attention to them more than their devices, but we had rules such as adding one of our emails as a recovery address to any socials they set up, so we could check up on them if we thought something bad was going down. Never had to use that, and I think just having it there made them think about what they did online.

    Around sixteen/seventeen, no filter and no more backdoors into their accounts. Just a couple of long heart to hearts about how shitty things can be on the internet and how we’re there to talk with no judgement if they need us.

      • BranBucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Boiler room is slang for a room filled with shady stock brokers using high-pressure tactics to sell crappy stocks for fraudulent reasons.

        When fund raiser time came around, his band teacher told everyone to take out their phones, call relatives, and try to get them to commit to buying x number of candy bars. It was like a little boiler room full of kids begging grandma to shell out $50 for mediocre chocolate.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    children under 12 should not have one, it has been shown they actually have problems reading and writing in HS, and doing math. 13+ they can have it, assuming they arnt trying to do something illegal, like stealing credit cards and buying games or whatever.