• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Housing should be for living in, not investing in.

    But before people go off on one about forcing up prices by controlling supply, that requires investors to actually push that lever, which means they need to leave places empty - and whenever I check there is never evidence of this.

    • Wojwo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here in Southern Utah there’s neighborhoods that are 75% second homes. I see that a lot.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are many possible solutions to the housing crisis, but many of them upset rich people so executing them is difficult. I meant executing the plan. Executing the rich people is also difficult, and may incidentally improve things.

    • Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s more money to be had buying houses than building them. More capitalists buy houses instead of building them. This makes home prices rise. So more capitalists buy houses instead of building them, prices go up more. Lather, rinse, repeat.