Samsung is shutting down messages and pushing the use of Google’s messenger. Are there alternatives? I don’t want to give Google that much personal info to train its AI or to give the regime an avenue to getting my info.

  • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There is Fossify Messages. A caveat. Fossify is a fork of some apps that were abandoned or had the license changed. After that happened, they were unmaintained for a while. That appears to have changed somewhat, but it has been 2 months since the last update on F-Droid.

  • lemonhead2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I miss the days when signal would do sms. then I didn’t need to deal with the rcs bs and could just use signal for everything

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Absolutely, all they needed to do was mark it witj a red flag on the profile pic to highlight insecure messaging.

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Might I suggest a VoIP provider? It costs money, yes, but since you are using your real number on VoIP, you can routinely switch carriers to get new customer deals. For example, I pay $15/month for unlimited data and $5/month to JMP.chat. JMP gives me unlimited text, 2 hours of voice, and voice is less than a cent/min after that is used. I was paying $40/month before for unlimited (still capped after 10 GB). JMP doesn’t require personal information (though they will know if you port an outside number and your phone number is public no matter what, so…). You can lie about your name and address to Mint (though I recommend putting a hotel address near you to comply with regional taxes for your payment plan. They’ll know your approximate location anyway).

    But why would you REALLY do this? Decoupling the phone number you actually use from your SIM card/eSIM is powerful. Everyone who wants to know your phone number can, especially if you live in the US. People search sites are crazy. Even barring that, you give it to the government, job applications, credit card companies, banks, random restaurants, tech companies (even if you are privacy conscious now you probably gave it to Google, Apple, and Microsoft at one point). Your SIM shows your approximate location, which can be legally pulled by the government. Stalkers, PIs, and bounty hunters can and do bribe carriers for this info as well. Unless you have a degoogled phone, your texts are likely being scanned by Google or Apple (look into the way they are blurring nude photos in texts unless your age is verified and asking you if you’re sure you want to send or open them).

    VoIP protects you from this, and also prevents targeted SIM swaps. You can also get multiple numbers (for JMP it is half price) if you need a work phone number, or for dating new people, restaurants, calling anonymously, etc.

    Downsides: Some websites won’t accept VoIP numbers. One government website even wouldn’t allow me to verify with my number that was previously not VoIP, but was the only number I had used, and therefore the only way to verify.

    If you talk on the phone a lot it can get pricey. But you should really be using something like Signal for anyone who you frequently talk to. Traditional voice, SMS, RCS, and even iMessage are all terrible for privacy & security, and should essentially be treated as a public social media post that you can’t delete.

    If your phone is carrier locked, it is nearly pointless: larger carriers require personal info so you don’t gain much anonymity, nor can you save money. If your phone is not degoogled, it is also a lot less useful since Google has your (much more accurate) location data. However, if you don’t have a Google account tied to your real name (or don’t use one at all) it still may be worth it.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My phone uses an alternate OS that does not implement RCS at all. I get & send SMS or MMS (multimedia message, i.e. pics, docs etc) to one or several recipients.

    So, from my POV, the alternative is just fuck Google and use SMS.

    Still, Samsung jumping the gun is worrying for future development.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There are no real alternatives to Google Messages. There are lots of SMS apps. None of them support RCS, because Google won’t let them. So any alternatives will be a downgrade at lest in that regard. Usually a number of others also.

    I’ve used most of the SMS apps out there, none are nearly as nice a Google Messages. It’s a shame, but it’s true. I’ve kinda settled on Textra for now, but I’m always looking for something better.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 hours ago

    For an SMS replacement, I’ve been using Fossify Messages for a while now and don’t have any complaints with it. It’s open source and doesn’t care about your personal info. I don’t really use SMS much, so idk if it has all the features you used in the Samsung messenger, but it might be worth trying out.

    EDIT: If you need RCS, I don’t think there are any open source choices for it, due to how its deployed afaik. You’re pretty much stuck with Samsung or Google or some other OEM’s SMS app.

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      looks like this automatically imports blocked numbers. very good, thank you 👍

      also since somebody reminded me of image compression, I’m also getting full images with this

        • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It was a pretty big bummer. Most people in my circle were using it up until that point. But, you know, the rest of the employed world operates on sms so waddya do

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        If you don’t evangelize all your contacts into using it, you wouldn’t get any benefit from using it for SMS anyway. That’s why they removed SMS support, it confused people about the privacy of SMS messages.

        • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The benefit for me was having an sms client that wasn’t Google’s. Additional privacy with other users that were already onboard with their own volition was a bonus.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            You get that using any other SMS app and Signal.
            Literally the only gain is having one app instead of two.

            • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              14 hours ago

              and yet here we are discussing alternative SMS apps, no? One might assume people want an app that can do sms to replace the sms app that is going away

              • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Two things happening.

                Signal never supported the type of RCS that google messages and iMessage use.

                You might have an easier time evangelizing signal if it also did SMS. But I believe them if they said the mixed messaging was more damaging to the UX than the slight advantage it granted.

                Especially since it can’t do RCS, since google is a monopolist.

                • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I did have an easier time recommending it back then. It made sense to recommend it. But literally nobody I convinced to use it was interested in continuing to do so when the devs removed a basic function

                • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I can’t control other people’s literacy. But I’m not going to use the messaging app that I can’t apply for jobs or talk to customers with

              • Steve@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                14 hours ago

                No we were talking about Signal.
                That’s what the comment you responded to mentioned.

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Literally the only gain is having one app instead of two.

              It’s also easier to convince others to use signal if there’s an added bonus: you’re already using it

                • ikt@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  it’s easier to convince someone to use one app that allows them to continue to talk to other people than 2

                  and the second one has no one else using it

    • Sunflier@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Does that carry over all the conversations? Does it go to the phone numbers directly? Or, do they need Signal too (like with TeamSpeak or Discord)?

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I would recommend you update the post title to clarify you are looking for an app that handles SMS and not just any regular messaging app. Signal requires the other user to also use signal.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I never figured how to sms through signal, works great as a whatsapp alternative though

  • NumG@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What I never understood: you have to pay your carrier for SMS services, but RCS is free (just need internet, mobile or wifi) like iMessage is also free? Rght?

    • BladeFederation@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      RCS and iMessage are essentially just separate internet based messaging apps like Signal or WhatsApp. iMessage doesn’t even require a phone number if you’re only messaging other iMessage users. The only difference being, they CAN message phone numbers, but if it isn’t “their” app, they’ll fall back to using SMS. iMessage has implemented RCS if messaging someone using Google Messages, but it is not encrypted, so essentially the same thing as SMS from a privacy and security perspective.

      As far as understanding it, both carriers and Google/Apple need to pay for infrastructure. For carriers it is cell towers, for internet based stuff it is servers. Carriers need you to pay for the infrastructure because they offer a single service (kind of, all 3 sell your data). Google & Apple make all kinds of money off of you in many ways, and getting high adoption for their apps makes them more powerful, especially since they have closed standards while SMS is open.

    • Yaky@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Free, sure. There is only one app that does it, with huge dependency on Google and/or carrier (whoever runs the servers), which could just… stop working one day, like it did for me.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As far as I can tell that’s still impossible, so they are just lying or it’s a different RCS (like retail custom solutions). Also that search shows SMS apps that don’t mention RCS.