“While Susan Collins’ campaign is backed by billionaire donors, our campaign is built on a movement funded by the people, with an average donation of $26,” said Graham Platner’s campaign manager.

A new analysis of campaign finance data shows that nearly 100 billionaires and their spouses have contributed to Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ reelection bid so far, funneling nearly $10 million to the incumbent’s campaign committee and PACs supporting her effort to fend off progressive challenger Graham Platner.

The Maine Monitor on Thursday published a list of billionaires who have donated to Collins and Platner, who has called his Republican opponent a “corrupt” protector and beneficiary of an oligarchic political system.

The outlet noted that Collins’ billionaire donation total “stands in stark contrast with the fundraising of her opponent… whose campaign has mostly attracted smaller amounts of funds but from many more people.”

  • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

      • deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        post conflict plan is socialist reconstruction & infrastructure but most liberals aren’t ready to accept that yet, they’d rather have oligarchy because it means they won’t have to give up their gentrified apartment

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Honestly, I think the 2nd biggest reason for the opposition to socialism, is change. People don’t like breaking habit, even if it is extremely bad for them. Better the demon you know, than a angel you don’t.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, you see, when I’m in charge, everything will be peachy! It’s the other oligarchs that are the problem.

    • 404found@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seems like a short sighted plan. Not much changed after what happened to the CEO of UHC insurance.

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Maybe not long term, but there was a noticeable uptick in claims being approved from what I recall. Whether you think Luigi was right or wrong, it’s hard to deny people are alive today because of him.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It directly resulted in thousands of claims being granted that would otherwise have been denied, literally saving thousands of lives. It got my dad’s heart surgery approved.

      • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’ll hit different when it’s all of them. 1 ceo death is not enough for change. Now go take your noise somewhere else.

        • 404found@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s cute you think the problem can be solved by wiping them out. You’re either naive or ignorant to the way things work. Either way I don’t want to be a part of this conversation anymore so I’ll just stop completely with my noise.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I call it the house cleaning fallacy. “Cleaning the house doesn’t solve the problem of things getting dirty”

              • 404found@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                Exactly. I feel like a lot of the people who are not in agreement with me on this issue are being short sited and impractical.

          • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Never said this was the solution to all the world’s ills. This is justice for thier crimes. Keeping them alive is more dangerous than keeping them living. They must be stopped. ASAP The only reason they should be kept alive is to torture information out of them that will lead to the arrests and eliminatation of the others.

            It is us or them. I choose us.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    BUT these Billionaires CARE about Us! THATS why they’re FORCING us to Invest ALL OUR RETIREMENT into Their Companies so they can be Trillionaires!

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Let’s interview everyone that has a grudge with Susan Collins.

    No? We can only interview every ex girlfriend, guy that’s willing to say something negative, and Republican friend of a friend that knows the grassroots guy. Huh, I wonder why.

  • NM_Gringo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hey, now. Susan Collins is very concerned about all the billionaire money in politics. Very concerned. Almost very, very concerned. Right on the edge.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    The cost of election campaigns in the US is just ridiculous. How/why does it cost millions/billions of dollars to run for public office?

    • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The cost comes from running ad campaigns on all media types, which are unfortunately shown effective, and PAC groups can unfortunately spend unlimited money attacking the opposition.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Let them waste their money. Mainers are not stupid. Can’t be said for my home state of CA unfortunately…

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I prefer my group of billionaires over their group. The Senate is so outrageously corrupt it is hard the fathom. It was created as a wealthy check on the will of the people. Just let that sink in.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It must be nice to be a sock puppet for the ruling class. Gotta feel great peeling off hundreds from their trillions.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Does Stephen King’s recommendation carry any weight? Has he made a statement regarding this? Maybe he’s smart to stay out of it.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The election won’t change anything. Republicans will remain in power, the Tr*mp family will establish a ruling dynasty, and Democrats will express moderate concern.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    7 days ago

    To them, losing the “progressives can’t win purple states” narrative would be a catastrophe.

    • Blibly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not only can progressives win in purple states, I bet they can win in these supposedly “red” states that have been abandoned by the Dems in recent years. Progressive takeover of the Democratic Party needs to happen ASAP.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        People in those red states will never vote for anyone with a ‘D’ next to their name, no matter how much they agree with them.

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree. I don’t think the actual silent majority thinks “that guy’s too far right” or “that lady’s too far left,” they ask “which one’s gonna help with my problems?”

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Just look at all the special elections earlier in the year that flipped seats. They’re definitely scared we’re waking up

        • edible_funk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Vote in every dem primary for the progressive candidate, campaign for the progressive candidate, run as the progressive candidate. Vote in every primary and every general.

        • Blibly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’m no strategist but: Primaries, local organizing with progressive supporters, and refusing to play the “civility politics” game that so many conservatives and neoliberals love to play. Be progressive and don’t apologize for it.

          Do they ever apologize? No, they don’t. We don’t either.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think it’s already happening. People are tired of the current leadership who have proven themselves deaf to the needs of the working class. They’ve just been stringing people along with performativism and virtue signaling, but people have definitely woken up to that in recent years.

        Also, establishment Dems’ catastrophic failures in last election followed by a series of progressive wins is a good signal. Progressives are demonstrating their electability, and that momentum will only build from here on. It will become increasingly harder for Democratic Party leadership to stifle the progressive caucus.

        Also, the new DNC chairman is at least nominally progressive. We’ll see how he does in two years. Till then all we can do is hope and wait and vote.