• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Interesting.

    Yes that was my suspicion.

    I think this would be a more solid trend if the 16-24 bracket ages, and ends up less intelligent when they’re 25-34.

    • tamal3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      So would you say that the article OP posted is misleading, and that the 16 to 24 bracket had also previously done worse on the test?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the suspicion.

        To be more accurate, I’d argue the data isn’t yet strong enough to support the headline.