• shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’d argue 4 is actually better than 3, just not in any way that actually makes it worth playing. 4 is a mediocre S.T.A.L.K.E.R. like, 3 is hot garbage.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe it’s because 3 was the first one I played, but 4 seemed much more shallow.

      Worse mini games and you show up on an organisations doorstep and 10 mins later you’re running the place.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        you show up on an organisations doorstep and 10 mins later you’re running the place.

        That’s every bethesda game. “Hey guy who did 7 mages guild fetch quests, congratulations you’re the new arch mage. Now do some more fetch quests.”

        • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re not wrong, but F4 felt particularly unearned.

          Maybe I was spoiled by things like The Witcher.

      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        the writing isn’t that much better in 3, the gameplay loop in 4 is vastly improved over 3, however.

    • AmbientChaos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      3 and New Vegas are great games. 4 was okay, they just sold a lot of the soul in exchange for mass appeal, just like Skyrim did compared to Oblivion and Morrowind